NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF DISQUALIFICATION – MARY ZAHOS
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mary Zahos
TARINGA QLD 4068
I, Andrew Orme, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 344(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have revoked the decision to disqualify you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have revoked the decision to disqualify you as I am satisfied that you are a fit and proper person.
The revocation takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 March 2022
Andrew Orme
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Simon Dann
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this revocation of disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for the effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. This Act was introduced to ensure that trustees and other entities in the superannuation sector operate with integrity, transparency, and in the best interests of their members. The SISA provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. In the case of Mary Zahos, the notice of revocation of her disqualification, issued under the authority of the Act, signifies that she has been deemed a fit and proper person to continue her role, aligning with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. This revocation, as detailed in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, reflects the Act's intent to ensure that only suitable individuals are entrusted with the responsibility of managing superannuation assets.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, governing their conduct and operations to ensure compliance with regulatory standards. Specifically, the Act covers trustees, directors, and other officeholders within the superannuation sector, imposing obligations and restrictions designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The jurisdictional reach of the Act extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a uniform approach to the regulation of superannuation funds. The Act provides for certain exclusions and exemptions, particularly for smaller funds or entities, as specified by the regulations or thresholds set out in the legislation. Additionally, the application and scope of the Act can be further defined or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations or guidelines issued by the relevant authorities to address specific issues or contexts within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The key provision of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to the notice of revocation of disqualification is found in subsection 344(6). This subsection mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide a notice to the disqualified person, in this case Mary Zahos, when the decision to disqualify has been revoked. The notice must include the reasons for the revocation and the date it takes effect, as seen in the notification provided by Andrew Orme. Additionally, subsection 126A(7) requires that the details of the revocation be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the decision.
Under the SISA, the obligations imposed on parties, including the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, are to ensure that any disqualification decisions are made in accordance with the Act and to provide a clear and formal notice of any revocations. The delegate must be satisfied that the disqualified individual is a fit and proper person before revoking the disqualification, as evidenced by the notice given to Mary Zahos. Furthermore, the Act requires that the revocation of disqualification be effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice dated 30 March 2022.
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 does not explicitly detail offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach in the context of revocation of disqualification. However, any failure to comply with the provisions of the Act, including the requirement to provide a proper notice of revocation, could potentially result in legal actions for non-compliance or procedural errors. The maximum penalties for breaches of the SISA can vary depending on the specific section breached, but they may include fines and, in some cases, imprisonment. For precise details on penalties, one would need to refer to the relevant sections of the Act that pertain to the nature of the breach.