NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF DISQUALIFICATION – Felicity Tol – 22 May 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Felicity Tol
Clifton Springs VIC 3222
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, have made a decision on 13 May 2025 to revoke the disqualification notice dated 16 January 2024, pursuant to subsection 108(2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.
The revocation of the disqualification order takes effect on 16 January 2024.
Dated: 22 May 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Alison Webster
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this revocation of disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced to provide a regulatory framework that ensures the proper management of superannuation funds, protecting the interests of fund members and promoting the integrity of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain and enhance the financial and operational soundness of superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of millions of Australians. Enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, the SISA grants the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) the authority to supervise and regulate the conduct of entities within the superannuation industry.
The revocation of a disqualification notice, as demonstrated in the case of Felicity Tol, illustrates the procedural mechanisms available under the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 to review and potentially overturn decisions that impact individuals' ability to participate in the superannuation industry. The revocation of Felicity Tol's disqualification notice by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, effective from the original date of disqualification, signifies the corrective action taken to address any potential errors or injustices in the initial decision-making process. This example underscores the importance of a robust legal framework that allows for the review and adjustment of regulatory actions, ensuring fairness and accountability in the administration of superannuation laws.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to a wide range of entities and individuals within the superannuation industry, including trustees, responsible entities, and certain other associated persons. The Act regulates the operation and administration of superannuation funds, ensuring compliance with financial standards and member protections. The legislation's jurisdiction extends nationally across Australia, applying uniformly in all states and territories, thereby creating a cohesive regulatory framework for the superannuation sector. However, certain exclusions and exemptions exist within the Act, such as for small APRA-regulated funds and self-managed superannuation funds with minimal assets or members. The Act also provides for the creation of subordinate instruments to further extend or restrict its application, as seen in the revocation of a disqualification order, which is subsequently published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes key provisions that govern the revocation of disqualification notices. Section 108(2) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 allows for the revocation of a disqualification notice by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as in the case of Felicity Tol, where the notice dated 16 January 2024 has been revoked effective from the same date. This means that the disqualification imposed on Ms. Tol, presumably related to her involvement in the superannuation industry, is no longer in effect.
The revocation process, as outlined in this document, requires adherence to the formal procedures stipulated by the Act. The delegate, Emma Rosenzweig, has exercised her authority under the relevant provisions to revoke the disqualification notice, which is a formal action that nullifies the previous order. The notice specifies the date of the decision and the date it takes effect, ensuring clarity and transparency in the revocation process.
Entities or individuals governed by the SISA must comply with the requirements set forth by the Act, including the procedures for the imposition and revocation of disqualification notices. This includes the obligation to notify relevant parties of any changes to their disqualification status and to ensure that any actions taken are in line with the legislative requirements. The revocation notice provided to Felicity Tol is an example of this compliance, demonstrating the procedural steps taken to formally revoke a disqualification order.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can lead to serious consequences. Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, the revocation of a disqualification notice is to be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. This ensures that the revocation is formally recorded and accessible to the public, thereby maintaining the integrity of the regulatory framework. Failure to comply with the requirements or to properly notify relevant parties could potentially lead to further administrative or legal actions, though specific penalties are not detailed in this particular notice.