NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Yadel Aydin 13 August 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Yadel Aydin
GLENROY VIC 3046
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 13 August 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debbi Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper management and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent regulation in the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Australian Parliament and aims to maintain high standards of conduct and compliance within the industry. One of its key policy objectives is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by disqualifying individuals who have breached the provisions of the Act. The recent disqualification notice issued to Yadel Aydin under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Emma Rosenzweig, exemplifies the Act's role in enforcing these standards and protecting the superannuation system from misconduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, and investment of superannuation funds in Australia. This legislation encompasses trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with the legal and regulatory standards designed to protect superannuation fund members. The jurisdictional reach of the SISA is national, applying across all states and territories in Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, with such disqualifications being communicated through Notifiable Instruments published in the Federal Register of Legislation. Additionally, the SISA stipulates that disqualified individuals face criminal penalties if they continue to act in their prohibited roles, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. The Act also allows for the reconsideration of disqualification decisions by the Commissioner, providing a mechanism for review within 21 days of receiving the disqualification notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the framework for the disqualification of individuals found to be in breach of the legislation. In the case of Yadel Aydin, the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Emma Rosenzweig, has disqualified him under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. This disqualification is effective from the day the notice is issued, which in this case is 13 August 2024. The grounds for the disqualification are based on the satisfaction of the delegate that Mr. Aydin has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, making the disqualification justified. This notice serves as an official communication to Mr. Aydin that he is no longer permitted to engage in certain activities related to superannuation entities.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals such as Yadel Aydin who are subject to disqualification. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate in such a capacity. This is a significant restriction designed to prevent disqualified individuals from participating in the management or oversight of superannuation funds, which are critical to the financial security of many Australians.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA, particularly the disqualification, can result in serious consequences. As noted in Note 2, it is a criminal offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited capacities, with the potential penalty being up to two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of its provisions. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked by the Commissioner on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as outlined in subsection 126A(5) of the SISA.
For Mr. Aydin, there are avenues available to seek reconsideration of the disqualification. Under section 344 of the SISA, if he is dissatisfied with the decision, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a process for review, providing a measure of fairness and due process to those affected by such decisions.