NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
WILMA JURAS
CAVERSHAM WA 6055
I, Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 19 August 2014
Alison Lendon
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Craig Blair
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues within the superannuation industry by ensuring proper regulation and supervision of superannuation entities. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by enforcing high standards of conduct and accountability. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain and improve the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system, thereby protecting the retirement savings of Australians. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act. This notice of disqualification is issued under the authority of the SISA and is intended to uphold the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing individuals with a history of contraventions from participating in the management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds within Australia. This legislation targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of bodies corporate that serve in these capacities for superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, governing practices across all states and territories of Australia. It imposes obligations and sets standards to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. The Act provides for disqualification from involvement in superannuation entities where there is evidence of contraventions, as demonstrated in the disqualification notice to Wilma Jurascaversham. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualification orders and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of decisions by affected parties. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as the notice of disqualification which specifies the grounds and effects of the disqualification.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Wilma Jurascaversham that she has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate fulfilling such roles. This decision, made by Alison Lendon, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, follows satisfaction that Wilma has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions. The disqualification is grounded in the seriousness and frequency of these contraventions, as outlined in subsection 126A(1) of the Act. The disqualification order is effective from the date of the notice, 19 August 2014.
Under the SISA, Wilma is prohibited from participating in any capacity that involves managing or overseeing superannuation entities. This includes any role as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. Additionally, she cannot serve as a responsible officer of a corporate body that engages in these capacities. This comprehensive prohibition aims to ensure that individuals who have breached the SISA do not continue to manage or influence superannuation funds, which are critical for the financial security of many Australians.
The obligations imposed by this disqualification are stringent. Wilma is legally barred from engaging in any activities that would allow her to influence superannuation entities. This includes not only direct roles such as trusteeship or management but also indirect roles such as being a responsible officer of a corporate body involved in superannuation management. Any attempt to circumvent this disqualification by taking on similar roles under different titles or through other entities would likely be considered a further breach of the SISA.
Breaching the terms of this disqualification carries significant legal consequences. Under the SISA, any attempt by Wilma to continue acting in a capacity she has been disqualified from can be considered an offence. The penalties for such breaches can include substantial fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. Specifically, the maximum penalties for contraventions of the SISA can vary, but they often reflect the seriousness of the breach, with potential fines reaching up to $222,000 for individuals and higher for corporate entities. Furthermore, ongoing breaches could lead to cumulative penalties, exacerbating the legal and financial repercussions for Wilma.