NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – WILLIAM ROBERT MALUNGAHU - 21 May 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
William Robert Malungahu
THORNTON NSW 2322
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 May 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a framework for the effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing the need for robust governance and oversight to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was passed by the Commonwealth Parliament and its primary objective is to ensure the proper administration and management of superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of millions of Australians. One significant aspect of the Act is its provision for disqualifying individuals who have acted in a manner that warrants such action, as seen in the case of William Robert Malungahu, who was disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA for being a responsible officer during corporate trustee contraventions. This legislative measure aims to maintain high standards of conduct within the superannuation sector, deterring misconduct and ensuring compliance with the law.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers of corporate trustees, imposing strict requirements and prohibitions on their conduct. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, applying across Australia under the Commonwealth's legislative authority. It imposes significant penalties for contraventions, including the potential for disqualification from managing superannuation entities, and these penalties extend to individuals who continue to act in prohibited capacities post-disqualification. The Act provides mechanisms for both the imposition and potential revocation of disqualifications, as well as avenues for reconsideration of decisions by affected parties. Importantly, the Act also allows for the publication of disqualification notices, ensuring transparency and public awareness of sanctioned individuals.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this notice pertain to subsection 126A(2) and subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA). Section 126A(2) outlines the grounds for disqualification, while subsection 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner of Taxation, or their delegate, must provide notice of the disqualification to the affected individual. In this case, William Robert Malungahu has been disqualified under these provisions because the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and Mr. Malungahu was a responsible officer of the corporate trustee at the time of the contraventions. The seriousness of these contraventions provides sufficient grounds for his disqualification. The notice, dated 21 May 2026, is signed by Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, and it informs Mr. Malungahu that his disqualification takes effect on the day the notice is made.
The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include ensuring compliance with the SISA by the trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities. In Mr. Malungahu’s case, his role as a responsible officer meant he had a duty to uphold the standards required by the SISA. His disqualification indicates a failure to meet these obligations due to the contraventions by the corporate trustee. Furthermore, the Act requires the Commissioner of Taxation, or their delegate, to provide formal notice of disqualification to the affected individual, which has been fulfilled in this instance. The notice also details that the information will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation under subsection 126A(7).
Breaching the terms of the disqualification can lead to serious legal consequences. Section 126K of the SISA specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with the knowledge that they are disqualified. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the terms of the disqualification. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the possibility of revoking the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or based on a written application from the disqualified person. Finally, under section 344 of the SISA, Mr. Malungahu has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if he is dissatisfied with it, provided that this request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and includes the reasons for his dissatisfaction.