NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - WILLIAM JONES - 8 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
WILLIAM JONES
BALCATTA WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6021
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 8 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the administration of superannuation funds in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of fund members and beneficiaries. The Act was introduced to address issues of mismanagement, financial misconduct, and breaches of duty by trustees and other responsible officers within the superannuation industry. This legislation was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament with the policy objective of ensuring the proper management and supervision of superannuation funds to safeguard the financial wellbeing of fund members. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who have been found to contravene the Act’s provisions, thereby preventing them from holding positions of responsibility within the superannuation sector. The Act includes provisions for the publication of disqualification notices, as well as penalties for those who continue to act in contravention of their disqualification.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and administration of superannuation entities in Australia. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who are found to have contravened the provisions of the SISA. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia, and is enforced by the Commonwealth. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions for who it applies to, meaning that any responsible officer of a corporate trustee found in breach of the Act is subject to disqualification. The Act's application can be extended through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and guidelines, which further define the scope and operational specifics of the Act. The disqualification of an individual, as exemplified by the notice to William Jones, is a serious measure that restricts the disqualified person from acting in any capacity related to the management of superannuation entities. This disqualification is a punitive measure intended to uphold the integrity and compliance of the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to the disqualification notice issued to William Jones under subsection 126A(6) are those that pertain to the disqualification of responsible officers. According to subsection 126A(2), the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a person from being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity if satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the contraventions were serious enough to warrant such a measure. Subsection 126A(6) requires the Commissioner to provide a written notice of the disqualification, which has been done in this case.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs, particularly on responsible officers and corporate trustees of superannuation entities. These include adherence to the statutory provisions and regulations governing the operation of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with all relevant financial and governance standards, and maintaining proper records and disclosures as required by law. In this case, the disqualification notice indicates that William Jones, as a responsible officer, failed to uphold these obligations, leading to the contraventions that resulted in his disqualification.
The SISA also outlines specific offences and penalties for breaches of its provisions. According to section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be associated with a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance by disqualified individuals. Additionally, the notice of disqualification is published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation under subsection 126A(7), ensuring transparency and public awareness of the disqualification.
Finally, the Act provides avenues for recourse in case of dissatisfaction with the disqualification decision. Under section 344, William Jones has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why the decision is deemed incorrect. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked by the Commissioner either on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person under subsection 126A(5), offering a potential pathway for reinstatement under certain conditions.