| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
William G White
MIDDLETON BEACH WA 6330
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 November 2018
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry. This Act was introduced to ensure that superannuation funds are managed efficiently, responsibly, and in the best interest of the fund members, thereby providing them with financial security in their retirement. The policy objective of the Act is to promote the proper management of superannuation entities and to protect the interests of members by enforcing high standards of conduct and compliance among trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act, as demonstrated in the case of William G White, who was disqualified due to serious breaches of the legislation.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities in Australia. Specifically, the Act imposes obligations and restrictions on trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth legislation that applies throughout Australia. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, which may provide further details and regulations to supplement the primary Act. In the case of William G White, the Act was applied to disqualify him from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry due to contraventions. The disqualification includes prohibitions on being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with serious penalties for non-compliance. The Act also provides avenues for review and potential revocation of such disqualifications, ensuring a structured process for addressing breaches and maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(1) provides the authority for disqualifying an individual who has contravened the SISA in a manner that warrants such action, while section 126A(6) mandates that the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give written notice of the disqualification to the affected person, which is evidenced in the gazetted notice to William G White. Section 126K, on the other hand, outlines the criminal offence that a disqualified person commits if they knowingly act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or a body corporate in a superannuation entity, despite being disqualified.
The SISA imposes several obligations on individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry. These obligations include compliance with various provisions of the Act to ensure the proper management and administration of superannuation funds. For example, trustees and other responsible officers must adhere to stringent fiduciary duties, governance standards, and reporting requirements to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in penalties and sanctions, including disqualification as notified in the gazette.
In the case of William G White, the disqualification notice indicates that he has contravened the SISA in a manner serious enough to warrant this action. The Act provides that disqualification is an appropriate response to ensure the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. Disqualified individuals are prohibited from engaging in activities that involve the management or administration of superannuation entities, as specified in section 126K. This prohibition is intended to protect fund members and maintain public confidence in the superannuation system.
The SISA includes provisions for offences and penalties to enforce compliance and deter misconduct. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or a body corporate of a superannuation entity, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This severe penalty underscores the importance of compliance with the Act and the serious consequences of non-compliance. Additionally, section 344 allows for the reconsideration of a disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected person believes the decision is unjust, providing a mechanism for review within 21 days of receiving the notice.