NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Wesley Berdnt
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Wesley Berdnt
BYFORD WA 6122
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 June 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen A Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent supervision and regulation within the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper management and administration of funds. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia, with a policy objective to establish a regulatory framework that promotes the efficient, honest and economical administration of superannuation funds, and to provide for the supervision of trustees, investment managers and custodians of superannuation funds. In line with this objective, the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting as responsible officers if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act. This legislative measure is intended to maintain high standards of conduct and accountability within the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals who are or have been responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to protect superannuation fund members. Specifically, the Act targets those who, while serving as responsible officers, fail to adhere to the legal requirements, thereby warranting disqualification under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA. This disqualification is effective immediately upon notice and prohibits the disqualified individual from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer of such entities, as outlined in section 126K of the Act. The jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, and includes the power to publish details of disqualifications in the Government Notices Gazette. While the Act broadly applies to those involved in the management of superannuation entities, it does not specify exclusions or exemptions, except for the potential revocation of disqualification under subsection 126A(5). Additionally, the Act may extend its application through subordinate instruments, further detailing the scope and enforcement mechanisms.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions under subsection 126A(2) that empower the Commissioner of Taxation, through a delegate, to disqualify individuals from being responsible officers of superannuation entities. In this instance, Wesley Berdnt has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner, due to the corporate trustee's repeated breaches of the SISA, with Berdnt being a responsible officer at the time of the violations. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance, as stipulated in subsection 126A(6) of the SISA.
The Act imposes a set of obligations on responsible officers, including a duty to ensure compliance with the SISA and to maintain the highest standards of fiduciary and ethical conduct. Failure to uphold these responsibilities, especially when associated with multiple contraventions, can result in disqualification. This process serves to safeguard the integrity and stability of superannuation entities and the interests of their members.
Section 126K of the SISA outlines serious offences for disqualified individuals who knowingly act in contravention of their disqualification. Specifically, it is an offence for a disqualified person to serve as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or be part of a body corporate that assumes these roles within a superannuation entity. The potential penalty for such an offence is severe, with a maximum of two years imprisonment. This underscores the gravity with which the Act treats breaches of these provisions.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for potential relief and recourse. Subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA enables the Commissioner to reconsider a decision if the affected individual submits a written request within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, explaining why they believe the decision should be overturned. This ensures that there is a pathway for legal and procedural review, safeguarding against potential injustices.