NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Wayne Perriam - 4 September 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Wayne Perriam
PARAFIELD GARDENS SA 5107
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 4 September 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to ensure that superannuation trustees, investment managers, and custodians operate with integrity and in the best interests of their members. The overarching policy objective of the Act is to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system by preventing misconduct and ensuring the proper management of superannuation funds. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members and maintaining the integrity of the industry. The recent disqualification notice issued to Wayne Perriam under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA exemplifies the Act’s role in enforcing compliance and penalising serious misconduct within the superannuation sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities within the superannuation industry, particularly those acting as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act has a national reach across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth statute. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions, which can result in significant penalties, including up to two years of imprisonment for acting in a disqualified capacity. The disqualification process is detailed in the Act, and the decision to disqualify an individual is communicated through a formal notice, which is subsequently published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. The Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application from the disqualified person. Individuals who are dissatisfied with the decision have the right to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from certain roles within the superannuation industry if they have contravened the Act. Under subsection 126A(1) and (6), a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the Act and that the seriousness of the contravention warrants disqualification. The notice of disqualification is provided directly to the individual concerned, stating the reasons for the decision and the effective date of the disqualification. In this case, Wayne Perriam has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation.
The Act imposes specific obligations on disqualified individuals. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer or a body corporate that performs these roles. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty of up to two years in jail. This restriction is intended to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to influence or manage superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Failing to comply with the disqualification can have significant legal consequences. As per section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity commits an offence that carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty reflects the gravity of the breach and the need to deter individuals from disregarding their disqualification.
There are also provisions for the possible revocation of the disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner's delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, section 344 allows the affected person to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes reasons for the perceived error in the decision. This process ensures that individuals have an opportunity to contest the disqualification if they believe it was unjust or improperly applied.