NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Wayne Ashley Ryder
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Wayne Ashley Ryder
BYFORD WA 6122
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Heather Reinke
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to ensure that the superannuation industry operates with integrity and to maintain public confidence in superannuation funds. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial welfare of superannuation fund members by enforcing compliance with high standards of conduct and governance among trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This legislation empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act, as demonstrated in the disqualification of Wayne Ashley Ryder under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA. The Act thus provides a mechanism to maintain the integrity and accountability of the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the trustees, responsible officers, and other relevant personnel involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia. This includes individuals and corporate trustees who are responsible for managing the investments and compliance of these funds. The Act's jurisdiction covers the entire Commonwealth of Australia, imposing uniform regulations and standards across the states and territories. Its primary objective is to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that the trustees and officers adhere to stringent regulatory requirements. The Act stipulates exclusions and exemptions for certain types of funds and entities, but generally, any person acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity is subject to its provisions. Additionally, the Act can extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, allowing for the detailed regulation of specific aspects of superannuation management and oversight.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the legal framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. Section 126A(2) allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if there are grounds to believe that the corporate trustee has contravened the Act and the individual was involved at the time of the contravention. The notice to the individual, such as Wayne Ashley Ryder, must detail the reasons for the disqualification and will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette under subsection 126A(7). The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice given to Ryder.
Under the SISA, the disqualified person, if aware of their disqualification, is prohibited from acting in certain capacities related to superannuation entities. Specifically, section 126K makes it an offence for a disqualified person to serve or act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, investment manager, or custodian. This restriction aims to prevent individuals involved in significant contraventions from continuing to influence superannuation entities. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is imprisonment for up to two years.
Furthermore, the SISA allows for the revocation of the disqualification. Subsection 126A(5) of the Act provides that the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for the individual to potentially regain their eligibility to serve in a responsible capacity within the superannuation industry, provided they meet the criteria for revocation.
For individuals who are aggrieved by the decision to disqualify them, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. If Ryder, or any other disqualified person, is dissatisfied with the decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must include the reasons why the decision is considered to be incorrect. This process ensures that there is a formal avenue for appeal and potential rectification of the decision.