| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Warren McKean
ELLIMINYT VIC 3250
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 28 October 2019
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pauline Truong
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed in a way that protects the interests of members. The Act was introduced to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of superannuation funds to maintain the integrity and sustainability of the retirement savings system. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial wellbeing of superannuation members by establishing standards for the governance, administration, and performance of superannuation entities. The legislation provides for the disqualification of individuals who have acted in a manner that undermines the integrity of the superannuation system. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is administered by the Australian Government, specifically through the Commissioner of Taxation, who has the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they have contravened the provisions of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, the Act applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees who oversee the compliance of superannuation entities with legislative requirements. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it governs superannuation practices across the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds due to significant breaches of the Act by the entities they oversee. The disqualification is intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure the integrity of the superannuation industry. Exclusions or exemptions from the application of the Act are not explicitly detailed in the notice; however, the Act generally extends its application to all superannuation entities unless otherwise specified. The Act also allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines issued by the Commissioner of Taxation. Disqualified persons, who knowingly engage in prohibited activities post-disqualification, face criminal penalties, including up to two years of imprisonment.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have been involved in the contravention of the Act by corporate trustees of superannuation entities. Specifically, section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of a person if they were a responsible officer at the time of the contravention, and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualification. The disqualification is notified under subsection 126A(6) and, as per the notice provided to Warren McKean, it takes immediate effect on the day it is issued.
Under the Act, the obligations imposed on entities and individuals governed by the SISA include compliance with all legislative requirements to avoid any contraventions that could lead to disqualification. For responsible officers, this includes ensuring that the corporate trustee adheres to the provisions of the Act to prevent any serious breaches that might result in their own disqualification. Additionally, section 126K imposes a legal obligation on disqualified persons to refrain from acting in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity.
Failure to comply with the Act and the subsequent disqualification notice can lead to serious consequences. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity mentioned, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This serves as a deterrent to ensure that individuals do not continue to operate within the superannuation industry in violation of the law. Furthermore, the Act provides avenues for reconsideration and potential revocation of the disqualification under sections 126A(5) and 344, respectively, allowing for a degree of procedural fairness.