NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Vijay Kundrapu
Walkley Heights SA 5098
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 April 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to ensure the proper governance and supervision of the superannuation industry. The Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight of superannuation trustees and responsible officers, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring only fit and proper persons manage their funds. The SISA provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals who do not meet the required standards, thereby maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial well-being and retirement security of superannuation fund members by enforcing high standards of conduct and competence among those managing superannuation entities. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds and outlines penalties for those who continue to act in a disqualified capacity.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds in Australia, including trustees, responsible officers, and entities that act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. This Act has a national reach, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia and impacting the operations of superannuation entities and their personnel regardless of state or territory boundaries. The Act specifically targets those deemed unfit and improper to manage or oversee superannuation funds, ensuring that such individuals cannot participate in the administration of these funds. The disqualification extends to any person who knowingly acts in the prohibited roles after being disqualified, with serious penalties including up to two years imprisonment for violations. Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualification notices under certain conditions and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the disqualified party contests the decision within 21 days of receiving notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes several key sections that address the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. Section 126A(3) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals who are not fit and proper persons to hold such positions. Section 126A(6) mandates that a notice of disqualification must be given to the affected individual, as exemplified in the notice provided to Vijay Kundrapu. This notice informs the individual of the grounds for their disqualification and the effective date of the disqualification.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs. Trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities must meet the fit and proper person test to ensure they can manage the entity's affairs responsibly. The Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals who do not meet these standards. Additionally, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This provision aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that only suitable individuals manage their funds.
Failure to comply with the Act’s provisions can lead to significant consequences. Section 126K outlines that knowingly acting in a disqualified capacity is an offence, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This reflects the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of disqualification orders. Furthermore, the Commissioner of Taxation has the discretion to revoke a disqualification notice under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person.
For individuals affected by the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. An individual who believes the decision is incorrect can request the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and include the reasons for dissatisfaction with the original decision. This provision ensures that affected individuals have an opportunity to challenge the decision and seek redress if they believe it is unjust.