Notice of Disqualification – Veronica Mary Roberts - 30 August 2024

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2024N00786 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – VERONICA MARY ROBERTS - 30 August 2024

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Veronica Mary Roberts

MELBOURNE VIC 3000

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) and 126A(3) of the SISA.

 

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you aren’t a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 30 August 2024

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

 

Per Alison Webster


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address issues and gaps in the regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that the interests of superannuation fund members are protected. This Act provides a comprehensive framework for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, including the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities. The SISA aims to maintain the integrity and reliability of superannuation fund management by ensuring that only fit and proper persons are entrusted with the responsibility of managing these funds. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act or who are otherwise unfit to hold positions of responsibility within superannuation entities. The notice of disqualification for Veronica Mary Roberts, issued under the authority of the SISA, highlights the importance of the Act's provisions in maintaining the standards required for the responsible management of superannuation funds.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision of superannuation funds in Australia, including trustees, responsible officers, trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs), and entities that manage or invest superannuation assets. The Act’s jurisdiction extends nationally across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act, meaning it applies uniformly regardless of state or territory boundaries. The Act excludes certain types of superannuation entities, such as public sector superannuation schemes and certain exempt public sector schemes, from its scope. The Act’s application can be further defined and extended through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations and guidelines that provide more detailed operational requirements and definitions. Additionally, specific exclusions and exemptions are outlined within the Act itself, such as the exemption of certain public sector schemes and certain small APRA-regulated funds. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals from being trustees or responsible officers if they are found not to be fit and proper persons, and this disqualification can be enforced through notices and penalties as outlined in the Act.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides specific provisions regarding the disqualification of individuals from holding certain positions within the superannuation industry. Section 126A of the SISA allows the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they are a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of a superannuation entity and there are contraventions of the SISA that warrant such a disqualification. This disqualification is based on the grounds that the individual is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position. In this case, Veronica Mary Roberts has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) and 126A(3) of the SISA, as it is determined that she was a responsible officer during the contraventions by the corporate trustee and the nature of these contraventions is serious enough to warrant her disqualification. The obligations and requirements imposed on individuals like Veronica Mary Roberts, who are subject to such disqualifications, include refraining from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as not being a responsible officer of any body corporate that serves in these capacities. This disqualification aims to ensure that those who have been found to be unfit to manage superannuation entities are prevented from continuing to do so, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. Additionally, the delegate must ensure that the details of the disqualification are published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, as stipulated under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. Failing to comply with the disqualification can lead to serious consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such an entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification order and highlights the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of these provisions. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified person. If an individual believes the decision to disqualify them is unjust, they have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision under section 344 of the SISA, provided that the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Notifiable Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.