NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Van Le
Casula NSW 2170
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager or custodian, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 April 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per: Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers act in the best interests of the fund members. The Act addresses the need for a robust regulatory environment to protect the financial interests and retirement savings of Australians. Enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, the SISA aims to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation industry by ensuring that only fit and proper persons are involved in managing superannuation funds. This includes the authority for the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to manage such funds, as evidenced in the disqualification notice issued to Van LeCasula under the Act. The policy objective is to safeguard the superannuation system against mismanagement and misconduct, thereby maintaining public trust and confidence in the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates performing these roles. The jurisdictional reach of the SISA is national, applying across Australia, with its provisions enforceable by the Commissioner of Taxation under Commonwealth law. The act specifically targets individuals deemed unfit and improper to manage superannuation funds, thereby ensuring the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry. A disqualified person, aware of their disqualification, is prohibited from acting in any capacity related to the management of superannuation entities, with severe penalties, including up to two years in jail, for non-compliance. The disqualification can be revoked either by the authority's initiative or upon application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, any person adversely affected by the disqualification has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to hold certain roles within superannuation entities. Section 126A(3) allows for the disqualification of individuals from being a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This means that the person named in the notice, Van LeCasula, is barred from these roles due to a determination that they are not fit and proper to perform these duties.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals who have been disqualified. According to subsection 126A(7), details of such disqualifications are to be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the decision. Moreover, section 126K establishes that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the restricted roles while being aware of their disqualification. This requirement is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry and protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Failure to comply with the disqualification can lead to significant consequences. Section 126K stipulates that knowingly acting in a disqualified capacity is an offence that carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the law regards the integrity of superannuation fund management. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual. This provision offers a pathway for reinstatement, provided certain conditions are met.
For those who feel aggrieved by the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Any affected party can request the Commissioner to review the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This avenue for reconsideration ensures that there is a formal process for addressing potential errors or injustices in the disqualification process.