NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - TYRON TIMPERI - 11 February 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
TYRON TIMPERI
SEAFORTH NSW 2092
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 11 February 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to provide a framework for the supervision of superannuation funds, aiming to ensure compliance with the law and to protect the interests of fund members. The SISA sets out the roles and responsibilities of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other responsible officers within the superannuation industry. It aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by preventing misconduct and ensuring that superannuation entities are managed in the best interests of their members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act, as demonstrated in the notice of disqualification to Tyron Timperi.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to various responsible officers within the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and their respective corporate entities. The Act's jurisdiction extends nationally across Australia, affecting entities and individuals involved in the management of superannuation funds. The scope of the Act encompasses the conduct and transactions of those entities and individuals, particularly focusing on compliance with the statutory obligations set out within the Act. Notably, the Act does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds in the context of disqualifications, but it does provide mechanisms for revocation of disqualifications and avenues for reconsideration by the Commissioner. The enforcement and administrative aspects of the Act may be extended or further defined through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines, which are published in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) involved in this case include subsection 126A(2) and subsection 126A(6). Subsection 126A(2) provides the authority to disqualify an individual from being involved in superannuation entities if certain conditions are met, while subsection 126A(6) mandates the Commissioner or their delegate to notify the disqualified person in writing of the decision. In this instance, Tyron Timperi has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, under subsection 126A(2) because the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA and Tyron was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Firstly, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid disqualification. This includes adhering to the legal and regulatory framework governing superannuation entities. Additionally, corporate trustees must operate within the guidelines set out by the SISA to maintain their licence and avoid penalties. These obligations are critical in ensuring the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry.
In terms of consequences for breach, section 126K of the SISA outlines that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such an entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches of its provisions. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person.
Finally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for review. If Tyron Timperi is affected by the decision and is not satisfied with it, he can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must include the reasons why he believes the decision is wrong. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the disqualification, providing a level of fairness and due process to those affected.