Notice of Disqualification - Tony Daher

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2022G00686 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Tony Daher

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Tony Daher

 

GREENVALE VIC 3059

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 5 August 2022

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Adrian Avolio


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues and gaps in the regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities act in the best interests of their clients. The Act was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework designed to protect the superannuation savings of Australians. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain high standards of conduct and competence within the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the financial interests of superannuation fund members. The disqualification of Tony Daher under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation is an example of the Act's enforcement mechanisms, reflecting its commitment to ensuring compliance with its regulatory standards.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals who are trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, or entities associated with superannuation entities within Australia. This legislation has a national reach, operating under the Commonwealth framework to regulate and oversee the superannuation industry. The Act specifically targets those who have contravened its provisions, with the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the management or administration of superannuation funds. The disqualification is imposed when there are serious breaches of the Act, leading to a prohibition on the disqualified person acting in specified roles within the superannuation sector. Furthermore, the Act stipulates that any disqualified individual found to continue in such roles commits an offence, subject to potential criminal penalties, including imprisonment. The Act also allows for the possibility of revoking the disqualification under certain conditions, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or following a written application by the disqualified individual.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a pivotal piece of legislation in Australia that oversees the supervision of the superannuation industry. Under this Act, a disqualification notice can be issued by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to an individual, such as Tony Daher in this case, who has contravened the provisions of the SISA (subsection 126A(6)). The disqualification can be imposed if the delegate is satisfied that the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action (subsection 126A(1)). In Tony Daher's case, he has been disqualified based on his contraventions of the SISA. The disqualification becomes effective on the date of the notice (subsection 126A(6)). The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. These obligations encompass maintaining the highest standards of conduct, ensuring the proper management of superannuation funds, and complying with all statutory requirements. For individuals such as Tony Daher, this includes adhering to the fiduciary duties and other responsibilities set out in the Act. Any failure to comply with these obligations can result in severe consequences, including disqualification from managing superannuation entities. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty of up to two years imprisonment for anyone who knowingly contravenes these provisions. This serves as a strong deterrent against non-compliance and aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. In addition to these penalties, the SISA provides mechanisms for reviewing disqualification decisions. Section 344 allows an affected person to request the Commissioner to reconsider a decision within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification. This request must be in writing and include the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified person. This provision ensures that there is a process in place for rectification if the initial decision is found to be unjust or based on incorrect information.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.