NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Tobias Ross Moran
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Tobias Ross Moran
GLANVILLE SA 5015
I, Emma Rozenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 29 June 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry and ensure the protection of superannuation funds. The legislation was introduced to address the need for oversight and governance in the management of superannuation entities, aiming to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they have been involved in serious breaches of the legislation. In the case of Tobias Ross Moran, he has been disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation due to his role as a responsible officer in a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA on multiple occasions. The policy objective of this disqualification is to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry by preventing individuals with a history of significant regulatory breaches from managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities. In this instance, the Act has been applied to Mr. Tobias Ross Moran, who was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities at the time of the contraventions. The Act is a Commonwealth legislation, thus its reach extends across the national jurisdiction. The Act prohibits certain conduct and sets out the penalties for contraventions, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for a disqualified person knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity. The disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Further, the Act allows for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if requested in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision. The notice of disqualification and details of the contraventions will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the Act (subsection 126A(2)). This disqualification can occur if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action, and if the responsible officer was in that role at the time of the contraventions (subsection 126A(6)). In the case of Mr Tobias Ross Moran, he has been disqualified as a result of such findings. This disqualification means that Mr Moran is barred from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, investment manager, or custodian (section 126K).
The Act imposes specific obligations on the parties it governs, including the requirement for responsible officers of corporate trustees to ensure compliance with the SISA. If a contravention occurs, the responsible officer can be held accountable, which may lead to disqualification if the contraventions are deemed serious enough. The Act also mandates that any disqualification be communicated to the affected individual, as demonstrated in the notice given to Mr Moran. Furthermore, the Act requires that details of the disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette (subsection 126A(7)).
Breaching the terms of this disqualification can result in serious consequences. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity, such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such entities (section 126K). The penalty for committing this offence can be significant, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment (subsection 126A(5)). Additionally, there is a provision for the disqualification to be revoked either by the Commissioner's office on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person. For those who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, the Act allows for a request to reconsider the decision to be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision (section 344).