NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Tjo Lay - 12 March 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Tjo Lay
CABRAMATTA NSW 2166
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 March 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to provide a framework for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring their funds are managed in a prudent and responsible manner. This Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to address the need for stringent oversight and accountability within the superannuation sector, which is crucial given the significant role these funds play in the financial well-being of individuals. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have breached the Act's provisions, ensuring that those entrusted with managing superannuation funds adhere to the highest standards of conduct and compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management or administration of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act regulates the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, imposing stringent requirements to ensure the integrity and protection of superannuation funds. The geographic reach of the SISA is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its stipulations, with the seriousness of the breach being a key factor in such decisions. The disqualification prohibits the disqualified individual from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, such as serving as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer of a body corporate performing these roles. The notice of disqualification, such as the one issued to Tjo Lay, is published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability. The Act allows for the possibility of disqualification revocation either on the initiative of the Commissioner or through a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, the Act provides a recourse mechanism for those dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, allowing for a reconsideration request within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions. Under section 126A(1), an individual may be disqualified from participating in the superannuation industry if the Commissioner of Taxation is satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA. The notice of disqualification is issued under section 126A(6), as evidenced in the notice provided to Tjo Lay on 12 March 2024. The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon issuance, as per the notice.
The Act imposes specific obligations on disqualified individuals, such as Tjo Lay, by prohibiting them from acting or being involved in any capacity within the superannuation industry, including as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This is clearly outlined in section 126K of the SISA, which stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to be or act in any such capacity. This prohibition extends to any responsible officer or body corporate that acts in such capacities. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in severe consequences.
The SISA sets out specific penalties for breaches of its provisions, particularly concerning the disqualification of individuals. According to section 126K, the maximum penalty for knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity as a disqualified person is two years in jail. This demonstrates the seriousness with which the Act treats violations of its provisions. Additionally, the Act provides avenues for review and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under section 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either by the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or following a written application from the disqualified person. Moreover, section 344 allows for the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if the affected party is not satisfied with the initial decision, provided that a written request is submitted within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision.