| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Timothy Clark
Southport QLD 4215
I, JAMES O'HALLORAN, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 March 2019
JAMES O'HALLORAN
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide comprehensive regulation of the superannuation industry, addressing the need for oversight and protection of superannuation funds in Australia. This Act was introduced to ensure the integrity and accountability of the superannuation industry by setting standards for trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The SISA is administered by the Australian Government, specifically through the Commissioner of Taxation, who has the authority to disqualify individuals found to be in breach of the Act's provisions. The policy objective behind the SISA is to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by enforcing compliance and penalising misconduct within the industry. In the case of Timothy Clark, the Commissioner's delegate has exercised the authority under the SISA to disqualify him due to his contraventions of the Act, highlighting the stringent measures in place to uphold the integrity of superannuation fund management.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, it applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, and its provisions are enforced to ensure compliance with standards set for the administration of superannuation funds. Notably, the act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its regulations, as evidenced in the notice of disqualification issued to Timothy Clark. This notice explicitly states that the disqualification is effective immediately and outlines the serious consequences of contravening the act, including potential criminal penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in prohibited roles. The act's reach is further extended through subordinate instruments that provide detailed guidelines and enforcement mechanisms, ensuring comprehensive oversight and compliance within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Timothy Clark that he has been disqualified from participating in the superannuation industry. This disqualification arises because the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, James O'Halloran, is satisfied that Timothy has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of these contraventions justifies his disqualification. The disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which is 18 March 2019.
The SISA imposes several obligations and requirements on individuals and entities within the superannuation industry. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate in such a role. This is designed to prevent disqualified individuals from influencing or controlling superannuation funds. The potential penalties for contravening this provision are severe, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment.
Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification may be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified individual, Timothy Clark in this case. This offers a potential pathway for reinstatement if the grounds for disqualification no longer apply or if new mitigating circumstances arise.
In addition to the disqualification notice, subsection 126A(7) of the SISA mandates that details of the disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the decision. Finally, section 344 of the SISA allows Timothy Clark, if dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must specify the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect.