NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Tasha Lee Glasgow- 8 August 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Tasha Lee Glasgow
Marangaroo WA 6064
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 8 August 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to safeguard the financial interests and retirement savings of Australians by ensuring that those involved in managing superannuation funds adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance. The SISA provides the framework for the establishment of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to supervise and enforce compliance within the superannuation sector. The overarching policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, thereby protecting the retirement benefits of participants. This legislative instrument serves as a critical tool in achieving these objectives by enabling the disqualification of individuals who fail to meet the required standards, as exemplified in the notice of disqualification issued to Tasha Lee Glasgow on 8 August 2025.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, with a focus on ensuring compliance and protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers or bodies corporate that act in these roles. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories within Australia. Exclusions from the Act's application are limited, with its provisions broadly encompassing the superannuation industry. The Act's application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and guidelines, which provide further detail and clarify specific aspects of the legislation. Disqualification under the Act, as illustrated in the notice to Tasha Lee Glasgow, is a serious matter that can result from contraventions of the Act's provisions, with significant penalties, including potential imprisonment, for those who continue to act in a disqualified capacity.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice of disqualification concern the grounds and consequences of disqualification from participating in the superannuation industry. According to subsection 126A(1), an individual can be disqualified if they have contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such a measure. The notice of disqualification (subsection 126A(6)) informs the individual that they have been disqualified and specifies the grounds for the decision. This particular notice to Tasha Lee Glasgow indicates that she has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) due to contraventions of the SISA. The disqualification takes immediate effect on the date of the notice.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on individuals and entities within the superannuation industry. These obligations include adherence to the provisions of the Act, which are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. For Tasha Lee Glasgow, this includes compliance with all relevant provisions to avoid any actions that might lead to further disqualifications or legal consequences. The Act also requires that any disqualified person must not act in any capacity that involves managing or overseeing superannuation entities, such as being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, as outlined in section 126K. Any such actions by a disqualified person constitute an offence under the SISA.
The consequences for breaching the SISA can be severe. According to section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity related to managing superannuation entities. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, as noted in the notice. This underscores the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of these provisions. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision under section 344, allowing Tasha Lee Glasgow to request a review if she believes the decision is unjust, provided she submits her request in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice.