NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
TAHIR MALIK
KINGSBURY VIC 3083
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 June 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the administration of superannuation funds and ensure compliance with standards designed to protect fund members. The Act addresses the problem of misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation industry, aiming to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by enforcing high standards of conduct and accountability among trustees, investment managers, and custodians. In this context, the Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals found to have seriously contravened its provisions, thereby preventing them from managing superannuation funds in the future. The enforcement of such disqualifications is intended to deter misconduct and uphold the integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities within Australia. Specifically, the Act targets trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers or corporate trustees. The geographic reach of the Act is nationwide, as it is a Commonwealth Act, thereby governing entities and individuals across all states and territories in Australia. The Act extends its reach through subordinate instruments, allowing for the revocation of disqualifications and the establishment of specific penalties for contraventions. A notable exclusion is that the Act does not specify particular industries but rather focuses on the roles and conduct of individuals and entities in the superannuation industry. The seriousness of contraventions, as outlined in the Act, can lead to disqualification from acting in a supervisory role within superannuation entities, with a potential criminal penalty of up to two years in jail for knowingly acting while disqualified.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued to Tahir Malik under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs him that he has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry due to breaches of the Act. This disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, as per the mandate of the SISA. The decision to disqualify Malik was made because it was determined that his contraventions of the Act were serious enough to warrant such action.
Under the SISA, Malik, as a disqualified person, is prohibited from acting or being involved as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or body corporate performing these roles. The Act explicitly outlines these restrictions under section 126K, which imposes a criminal offence on any disqualified person who knowingly engages in these activities. The penalty for such an offence is significant, with a maximum sentence of two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the contraventions.
Furthermore, the SISA provides avenues for review and potential revocation of the disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by Malik himself. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if Malik is dissatisfied with the outcome. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must detail the reasons for dissatisfaction.
The notice also informs Malik that the details of his disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as stipulated by subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. This publication serves to notify the public and relevant stakeholders of the disqualification, ensuring transparency and accountability within the superannuation industry.