NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – SUSANNAH JOHNS- 4 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
SUSANNAH JOHNS
ARMADALE VIC 3143
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 4 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation within the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament, with the overarching policy objective of ensuring that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and that the investments of members are safeguarded. One significant aspect of the Act is its power to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, particularly when the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. This authority is intended to deter misconduct and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. The Act provides mechanisms for the Commissioner of Taxation to delegate the power to disqualify individuals, ensuring that appropriate actions are taken when necessary.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, or oversight of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This Act operates at the Commonwealth level, meaning its provisions and enforcement extend across Australia. The Act's primary focus is on ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds to protect the interests of fund members. Exclusions or exemptions are not explicitly stated within the provided notice, but it is likely that the Act allows for certain categories of persons or entities to be exempt under specific conditions, as is common in regulatory frameworks. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations or other legislative instruments that provide further detail on specific aspects of the Act. In this instance, the disqualification of Susannah Johns serves as an example of the Act's enforcement mechanisms, where the seriousness of contraventions can lead to disqualification from roles within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes several key provisions related to the disqualification of individuals from certain roles within the superannuation industry. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the SISA, particularly where the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such a measure. Subsection 126A(6) mandates that a notice of disqualification must be given to the individual, as seen in the notice to Susannah Johns. This disqualification becomes effective on the day it is issued, as stated in the notice dated 4 November 2024, signed by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals who have been disqualified. Under subsection 126A(7), details of this disqualification are to be published in the Federal Register of Legislation as a Notifiable Instrument. This transparency ensures that the public and relevant industry stakeholders are informed about the disqualification of individuals who have breached the SISA. Additionally, section 126K imposes strict prohibitions on disqualified individuals, making it an offence for them to act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of a superannuation entity, or to be responsible officers of such entities. The severity of these prohibitions is underscored by the potential two-year jail sentence for violating these provisions.
There are also provisions for potential revocation of disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. The disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or based on a written application from the disqualified individual. This provides a pathway for individuals to potentially regain their eligibility to participate in the superannuation industry if they can demonstrate that the grounds for their disqualification no longer apply. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for a reconsideration request by the Commissioner if the disqualified individual is not satisfied with the decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must articulate the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the disqualification if the individual believes it to be unjust or based on erroneous information.