NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – SUE VAAFASUAGA - 17 January 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
SUE VAAFASUAGA
MOOREBANK NSW 2170
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 January 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation funds, thereby addressing the need for stringent oversight to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act aims to ensure the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry by imposing obligations on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, and by providing mechanisms for the supervision and enforcement of compliance with these obligations. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Amendment (Strengthening Governance and Other Measures) Act 2022 further amended the SISA to enhance the governance and accountability of superannuation funds, reflecting a policy objective of safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The notice of disqualification issued under the SISA aims to prevent individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act from participating in the management of superannuation entities, thereby maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it applies to trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers and corporate bodies that act in these capacities. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia. It is designed to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation funds, which are significant financial instruments in the Australian retirement system. The Act imposes various obligations on these entities to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act's application are limited, ensuring comprehensive oversight of the superannuation industry. Subordinate instruments may further extend or restrict the application of the Act, providing additional regulatory detail or addressing specific issues within the industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines specific provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its requirements, as demonstrated in the notice provided to Sue Vaafasuaga. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of individuals based on their contraventions of the Act, while subsection 126A(6) mandates that a notice of disqualification be given to the affected person. The notice to Sue Vaafasuaga, issued by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, clearly states that she has been disqualified due to her contraventions of the SISA. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as indicated in the notice dated 17 January 2024.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For instance, section 126K prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles. This is to ensure that individuals who have been found to have contravened the Act do not continue to manage or have influence over superannuation funds. Subsection 126A(7) further mandates that details of the disqualification be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions.
Failure to comply with the disqualification provisions can lead to significant consequences. Section 126K imposes a criminal offence on disqualified individuals who knowingly continue to act in roles that they have been prohibited from, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) provides for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for individuals to potentially have their disqualification overturned under certain conditions. Furthermore, section 344 allows the Commissioner to reconsider a disqualification decision if the affected person submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, explaining why they believe the decision is incorrect. This process ensures that there is a mechanism for review and potential rectification of the disqualification decision.