NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Subodh Patil
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Subodh Patil
STANHOPE GARDENS NSW 2768
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 8 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. The legislation aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities operate in a compliant and responsible manner. The SISA was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive regulatory regime that could safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members, especially in light of the increasing complexity and size of the superannuation industry. Enacted by the Australian Parliament, the policy objective of the SISA is to maintain high standards of conduct and governance within the superannuation sector, thereby fostering trust and confidence in the system among participants.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, imposing significant obligations to ensure compliance with the Act. In this instance, Subodh Patil has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to his role as a responsible officer during instances where the corporate trustee contravened the Act. The disqualification impacts the individual, prohibiting them from acting in specified capacities within the superannuation industry. The jurisdictional reach of this disqualification is national, as the SISA is a Commonwealth Act, and its application extends across Australia. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with the potential penalty being up to two years in jail. Additionally, the disqualification may be revoked under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Affected individuals may seek reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to the disqualification notice are subsection 126A(2) and subsection 126A(6). Subsection 126A(2) outlines the grounds for disqualifying an individual from acting as a responsible officer of a superannuation entity, such as a contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee. Subsection 126A(6) mandates the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to give a disqualified person written notice of the disqualification, which includes the reasons for the decision.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on the parties it governs are substantial. Responsible officers of corporate trustees are expected to ensure compliance with the Act, which includes adhering to the legislative standards governing the management and administration of superannuation entities. This means that they must not only understand the provisions of the Act but also implement and monitor compliance within their organisations. The disqualification notice signifies a breach of these obligations, specifically by contravening the SISA.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can lead to severe consequences. Under section 126K of the Act, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. Additionally, the disqualification itself bars the individual from participating in the administration of superannuation entities, which can have significant professional and legal ramifications.
Section 126A(5) of the SISA provides a mechanism for potential revocation of the disqualification, either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon the written application of the disqualified person. Section 344 of the Act allows for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the disqualification and believes it to be incorrect. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must articulate the reasons for the appeal.