NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – STEVEN LOWERSON
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Steven Lowerson
SUNSHINE WEST VIC 3020
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 March 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Rachael Anderson
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing a need for oversight to protect superannuation funds and beneficiaries. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament and aims to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by establishing a regulatory framework that ensures compliance and accountability within the industry. The notice of disqualification of Steven Lowerson under the SISA highlights the enforcement mechanisms within the Act, which are designed to penalise serious breaches by responsible officers of corporate trustees. The disqualification not only serves as a deterrent but also ensures that individuals who have contributed to significant regulatory breaches are held accountable, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers of these entities. The Act has a national reach, applying across Australia, and is overseen by the Commissioner of Taxation. Its primary purpose is to ensure the integrity and proper administration of superannuation funds. The disqualification provision under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA applies to individuals who, while serving as responsible officers of corporate trustees, have been involved in contraventions of the Act that are serious enough to warrant such a penalty. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance and prohibits the disqualified person from acting in any capacity involving the administration or management of superannuation entities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for those who contravene this prohibition. This Act may also extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, although specific details of these are not provided in the gazetted notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from being involved in superannuation entities if they are responsible officers of a corporate trustee that has contravened the Act. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual if they are satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the Act and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. This disqualification can occur if the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such action. Section 126A(6) requires the delegate to give notice to the disqualified person, as demonstrated in the notice to Steven Lowerson, which took effect from the date of issuance.
The SISA imposes obligations on parties and entities it governs, including ensuring compliance with the Act's provisions. For individuals who are responsible officers of a corporate trustee, this includes adhering to the standards and regulations set out in the SISA to avoid potential disqualification. Trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities must also comply with the Act, which includes maintaining proper records, reporting requirements, and ensuring the financial health and security of the superannuation funds. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to disciplinary action, including disqualification.
Breaching the SISA can result in serious consequences. Under section 126K of the Act, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, a disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or following a written application from the disqualified person. For those dissatisfied with a disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for requesting a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision, giving reasons why the decision should be reconsidered.