NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – STEPHEN GILTINAN
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
STEPHEN GILTINAN
BAYSWATER WA 6053
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 15 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. The Act aimed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by establishing a robust framework for the governance and administration of superannuation funds. The policy objective of the Act is to ensure the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings and financial security of Australians. In the case of Stephen Giltinan, he has been disqualified under the Act due to contraventions that were deemed serious enough to warrant such action, reflecting the Act's intent to maintain high standards of conduct within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, directors, and officers of superannuation entities. The Act operates nationally, extending its reach across the Commonwealth of Australia. Its primary objective is to ensure the proper administration of superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of fund members. The Act’s provisions apply to all forms of superannuation entities, including industry, retail, and public sector funds. Notably, the disqualification power under the SISA can be exercised against individuals who have contravened the Act, with the decision to disqualify being made by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The disqualification prohibits the disqualified person from acting in certain capacities related to superannuation entities, such as trustees or investment managers. This disqualification is enforceable and carries significant penalties, including potential imprisonment for those who violate the terms of their disqualification. The Act allows for the revocation of disqualification under certain conditions and provides avenues for review and reconsideration of the decisions made under its authority.
Key Provisions
The notice provided to Stephen Giltinan under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs him of his disqualification from participating in the management of superannuation entities. This disqualification is the result of a determination by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who has concluded that Giltinan has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and that the seriousness of the contravention warrants his disqualification. This disqualification, as stated in subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, is effective immediately from the date the notice is issued, which in this case is 15 March 2022. The notice also reminds Giltinan that the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA.
The SISA imposes several obligations on individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds. These obligations include adherence to the provisions of the Act, which are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. For Giltinan, who has now been disqualified, the obligations include refraining from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or body corporate of such entities, as per section 126K of the SISA. These roles are critical in managing the funds and investments of superannuation entities, and the SISA mandates that only fit and proper persons should be entrusted with these responsibilities.
Breaching the conditions of disqualification under the SISA is not only a serious administrative matter but also a legal one. Section 126K of the SISA explicitly states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the restricted roles mentioned above. This offence is punishable by up to two years in jail, underscoring the gravity of the contraventions that led to Giltinan's disqualification. The legislative intent is clear: to prevent individuals who have demonstrated unfitness from managing superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the financial security of superannuation members.
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon Giltinan's written application. This provision allows for a review and potential restoration of his eligibility to participate in the management of superannuation entities, provided that the circumstances that led to the disqualification are rectified. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA offers a mechanism for Giltinan to challenge the disqualification decision. If he is not satisfied with the outcome and believes the decision to be incorrect, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must articulate the reasons why the decision is considered wrong, providing Giltinan with a formal avenue to contest the disqualification.