NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Stephen Crowe - 6 June 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Stephen Crowe
East Perth, Western Australia, 6004
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 6 June 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation provides a framework to ensure that superannuation entities are managed responsibly and that the interests of superannuation fund members are protected. The SISA was introduced by the Australian Parliament to address the problem of misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation industry, aiming to enhance the overall integrity and stability of the sector. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the superannuation savings of Australians by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians comply with their regulatory obligations and act in the best interests of fund members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, as demonstrated by the recent notice of disqualification issued to Stephen Crowe. This legislative measure reflects the ongoing commitment to maintaining high standards within the superannuation industry and protecting the financial security of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act specifically targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, as well as body corporates that act in these roles. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it applies across all states and territories of Australia. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its requirements, and such disqualifications are enforceable Commonwealth-wide. The Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines, which provide further detail on specific requirements and exemptions. Notably, the Act does not specify any particular exclusions or thresholds within the primary text, but such details may be found in the subordinate instruments.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to the disqualification notice issued to Stephen Crowe are subsection 126A(1), which allows the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the SISA, and subsection 126A(6), which mandates the issuance of a notice to the disqualified person. The notice, as specified in subsection 126A(6), must detail the reasons for the disqualification and the effective date of the disqualification. In this case, Stephen Crowe has been disqualified because the delegate is satisfied that he contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies the disqualification.
The obligations imposed by the Act on Stephen Crowe include refraining from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as avoiding any role as a responsible officer or body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. These obligations are explicitly stated in section 126K of the SISA, which sets out that it is an offence for a disqualified person to undertake such roles. The seriousness of the contraventions leading to the disqualification indicates that Stephen Crowe must strictly adhere to these restrictions to avoid further legal consequences.
Failure to comply with the disqualification requirements established by the SISA can result in significant penalties. Section 126K stipulates that knowingly acting in the prohibited roles can lead to a criminal offence, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail. This underscores the gravity of the disqualification and the necessity for Stephen Crowe to avoid any actions that could be interpreted as breaching the terms of his disqualification. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) provides a mechanism for potential revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by Stephen Crowe.
Should Stephen Crowe be dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has recourse under section 344 of the SISA. He can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration process provides an opportunity for Stephen Crowe to present any arguments or evidence he believes should lead to the revocation or modification of the disqualification. This provision ensures that the process remains fair and allows for the possibility of rectifying any perceived injustices in the initial decision.