NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Skye Saunders
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
SKYE SAUNDERS
DUNCRAIG WA 6023
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 24 April 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Donna Williams
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of the fund members. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and management of superannuation funds, given their significant role in the retirement income system. The SISA provides a framework for the regulation and supervision of superannuation funds, including the powers of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to monitor and enforce compliance. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers act with integrity and competence. The Act aims to prevent misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation industry, thereby maintaining public confidence in the system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act and applies throughout Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as demonstrated by the notice issued to Skye Saunders. The disqualification prohibits the disqualified individual from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, such as being a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The Act allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under certain circumstances. Additionally, the Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as the Gazette, which is used to publish details of disqualification notices. The Act does not specify any stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the provided excerpt.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a significant piece of Australian legislation aimed at regulating the superannuation industry. Section 126A(6) of the SISA mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide notice of disqualification to an individual who has been disqualified under the Act. This notice informs the individual that they have been disqualified due to serious contraventions of the SISA. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon the notice being issued.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on individuals such as Skye Saunders are stringent and aimed at maintaining high standards within the superannuation industry. Section 126K of the SISA explicitly states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate performing such roles. This means that individuals like Skye Saunders, once disqualified, must refrain from any activities that would involve them in the management or oversight of superannuation funds. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to serious legal consequences.
In terms of consequences for breach, section 126K of the SISA imposes a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for any disqualified person who knowingly acts in violation of their disqualification. This is a severe penalty, reflecting the importance of adherence to the Act’s provisions. Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for revocation of disqualification under subsection 126A(5), allowing for either the Commissioner or the disqualified individual to apply for the disqualification to be lifted. This ensures that the process is fair and allows for reconsideration of the circumstances leading to the disqualification.
For individuals who believe their disqualification is unjust, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse. This section allows for a request to the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. The request must be made in writing and must clearly state the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for appealing the decision, providing a measure of legal protection and fairness to those affected by the Act’s provisions.