NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Sione Mapapalangi
Concord West NSW 2138
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 November 2019
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure the proper management and administration of superannuation funds, to protect the interests of fund members, and to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. The Act is overseen by the Australian Parliament, which enacts the legislation to provide a framework for the regulation of the industry. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by establishing a robust regulatory environment, thereby preventing mismanagement, misconduct, and fraud within the industry. The Act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are found to have contravened its requirements, as a means of deterring future misconduct and protecting fund members from potential harm.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act has a Commonwealth jurisdictional reach, and its provisions extend across Australia. The legislation provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, with the seriousness of the contraventions being a determining factor in such disqualifications. Once disqualified, the individual is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles, with the potential for a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for non-compliance. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied. Subordinate instruments may further define and extend the application of the Act, ensuring comprehensive oversight of the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions that permit the disqualification of individuals who contravene its requirements. Section 126A(1) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals based on their contravention of the Act, with subsection 126A(6) mandating the issuance of a notice of disqualification. In this case, Sione Mapapalangi has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, due to a determination that the seriousness of the contraventions warrants such action. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as outlined in subsection 126A(6).
The disqualification imposes significant obligations and requirements on Sione Mapapalangi. Notably, section 126K of the SISA prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This prohibition is crucial to maintain the integrity and supervision of the superannuation industry. The disqualification also necessitates compliance with the broader regulatory framework established by the SISA, ensuring that Sione Mapapalangi does not engage in activities that could undermine the financial security of superannuation fund members.
Failure to adhere to the disqualification provisions carries serious consequences. Section 126K of the SISA imposes a criminal offence on a disqualified person who knowingly acts in the prohibited capacities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This underscores the gravity of the contraventions that led to the disqualification and the importance of compliance with the SISA. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
For Sione Mapapalangi, the notice of disqualification provides an opportunity to seek reconsideration of the decision under section 344 of the SISA. If dissatisfied with the disqualification, he can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and must detail the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect. The process for reconsideration ensures that the disqualification decision is fair and just, providing a mechanism for addressing any potential errors or misunderstandings.