NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Siobhan Cases
BLACKTOWN NSW 2148
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 18 October 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per: Theo Saltis
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate and oversee the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing issues related to the administration and governance of superannuation funds. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to ensure that superannuation funds are managed with integrity and in the best interests of the members. One of the key policy objectives of the SIS Act is to protect superannuation fund members by establishing a framework that ensures the responsible and efficient management of their superannuation entitlements. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from being trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act's provisions in a manner that warrants such action. This legislative measure is intended to maintain the trust and confidence of the public in the superannuation system by holding accountable those who fail to comply with the regulatory standards set out in the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities. This legislation covers trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other responsible officers who manage superannuation funds. The Act's jurisdiction is national, applying across Australia, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The disqualification provisions outlined in the Act, such as those under section 126A, allow for the removal of individuals from their roles if they are found to have contravened the Act's provisions. The disqualification is applicable immediately upon the issuance of the notice, as seen in the notice given to Ms Siobhan Cases. The Act also provides for the publication of such disqualifications in the Gazette, ensuring transparency. Additionally, the Act includes provisions for the revocation of disqualification orders and for the reconsideration of decisions by affected parties within a specified timeframe. The Act's reach and enforcement are extended through subordinate instruments, which may include regulations and guidelines issued by the relevant authorities.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) includes a provision under section 126A that allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from holding positions of responsibility in superannuation entities. Specifically, subsection 126A(1) empowers a delegate of the Commissioner, such as Ivan Parrett, to disqualify a person from being a trustee or a responsible officer if there is a contravention of the SIS Act. The decision to disqualify Ms Siobhan Cases, as stated in the notice, was made under this subsection due to her contraventions of the Act, which the delegate found to be of a nature and seriousness warranting disqualification. This disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which is 18 October 2013.
Under this Act, Ms Cases is now prohibited from serving as a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in managing superannuation entities. This includes roles as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, thereby limiting her professional capacity within the superannuation industry. The delegate's decision was made based on evidence of Ms Cases' contraventions of the SIS Act, and the disqualification order is now in force, preventing her from participating in the management of superannuation entities.
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals like Ms Cases who are disqualified. For instance, they are legally barred from engaging in activities that would allow them to manage or influence superannuation entities. Additionally, the Act requires that particulars of such disqualification orders be published in the Gazette, as stipulated in subsection 126A(7). This public notification serves to inform the broader public and industry stakeholders of the disqualification, ensuring transparency and accountability.
Failure to comply with the disqualification order could lead to legal consequences. While the notice does not explicitly detail offences or penalties within its text, the overarching framework of the SIS Act suggests that breaches of its provisions can result in significant penalties. For example, under section 136 of the SIS Act, individuals found guilty of breaches can face substantial fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the contravention. Furthermore, section 344 of the SIS Act allows for a review of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner, offering a recourse for the affected party if they believe the decision was unjust or made in error.