Notice of Disqualification - Simon Fritsch - 10 September 2024

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2024N00825 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Simon Fritsch - 10 September 2024

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Simon Fritsch

 

CARLTON NORTH VIC 3054

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) and subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.

 

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you aren’t a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

 

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 10 September 2024

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

Per Tamyka Beurskens


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers adhere to stringent standards to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to create a regulatory framework that maintains the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation system. The primary policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial wellbeing of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act with the highest standards of care, diligence, and loyalty. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities, thereby maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and supervision of superannuation entities. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers of corporate trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds. The disqualification notice issued under this Act extends its reach to the Commonwealth level, ensuring a uniform application across Australia. The grounds for disqualification include contraventions of the SISA by the corporate trustee, coupled with the seriousness of these contraventions, and the individual's unfitness to hold a responsible position in the superannuation industry. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance, as stipulated in the notice. Additionally, the Act allows for the publication of disqualification details as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness. The Act also provides for potential revocation of disqualification and outlines the appeal process for those dissatisfied with the decision.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have been involved in breaches of the Act by the corporate trustees they represent. In subsection 126A(6), the Act mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must notify an individual of their disqualification if the delegate is satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and that the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. Additionally, under subsection 126A(2) and subsection 126A(3), the disqualification can also be based on the delegate's satisfaction that the individual is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position. This notice, as evidenced in the document, is given to Simon Fritsch, specifying the grounds and effective date of the disqualification. The obligations imposed by the SISA on individuals like Simon Fritsch are significant. Firstly, they must ensure that they do not act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that performs these roles, if they are aware that they have been disqualified. This is a strict requirement, as outlined in section 126K of the Act, which makes it an offence to contravene this prohibition. Non-compliance with these obligations can lead to severe consequences, including potential criminal charges. The SISA provides clear consequences for any breach of the disqualification provisions. According to section 126K, a disqualified person who knowingly acts in any capacity related to the management of a superannuation entity commits an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence, as stated in the notice, is two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of disqualification orders, ensuring that only fit and proper persons manage superannuation entities. Furthermore, the SISA allows for the potential revocation of a disqualification order. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provision provides a pathway for individuals to seek to have their disqualification lifted if they can demonstrate that the circumstances leading to their disqualification have changed. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for individuals to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner, provided that this request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the disqualification and includes the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This ensures that there is a formal process in place for individuals to challenge the decision if they believe it to be unjust.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Notifiable Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.