Notice of Disqualification - Sharon Wood

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2016G00390 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

To:

Mrs Sharon Wood

MAYFIELD   NSW 2304

 

I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

Dated: 21 March 2016

James O’Halloran

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

 

 

Per Bernard Morrison

 

 

 


Note 1:

In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

Note 2:

In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.

Note 3:

In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the effective and responsible management of superannuation funds in Australia, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislation was introduced to address the problem of ensuring that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons, thereby maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The SISA is overseen by the Australian Parliament, and its policy objectives include safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation members by imposing strict standards on those who manage these funds. The disqualification of an individual such as Mrs. Sharon Wood, as evidenced by the notice issued under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, underscores the importance of these legislative provisions in preventing unsuitable persons from holding positions of responsibility within the superannuation industry.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and operation of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, it targets trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities, ensuring they meet the criteria of being fit and proper persons to manage these funds. The Act has a Commonwealth jurisdiction, thereby extending its reach across the entire nation. The disqualification of individuals such as Mrs Sharon Wood, as detailed in the gazetted notice, is based on a determination that they are not suitable to hold positions of trust and responsibility within the superannuation industry. This legislative instrument provides for the disqualification of individuals under certain conditions and empowers the Commissioner of Taxation, through delegates such as James O’Halloran, to enact these disqualifications. The notice to Mrs Wood exemplifies the Act's application, detailing the grounds for her disqualification and the immediate effect of such a decision. Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for potential revocation of the disqualification and avenues for reconsideration by the Commissioner, ensuring procedural fairness for those affected.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must notify the individual of their disqualification. This notification must detail the reasons for the disqualification, which in this case is the determination that Mrs Sharon Wood is not a fit and proper person to serve in such a capacity (subsection 126A(3)). The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice provided to Mrs Wood. The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals like Mrs Wood who are trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. They must maintain a high standard of integrity and competence, ensuring that they manage the superannuation entity in a manner that is in the best interests of its members. Failure to meet these standards can result in disqualification, as it has in Mrs Wood’s case. Furthermore, the Act requires that any disqualifications be formally communicated to the affected individual and that these decisions may be subject to review or reconsideration if the individual believes there has been an error or injustice. Under the SISA, there are several potential consequences for non-compliance or breaches of the Act. For instance, being disqualified from serving as a trustee or responsible officer is a significant penalty in itself, as it not only affects the individual’s professional standing but also their ability to engage in activities related to superannuation management. Additionally, subsection 126A(7) of the Act mandates that details of the disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, which can further impact the individual’s reputation and professional opportunities. Moreover, according to section 344 of the SISA, individuals who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision have the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision. This provision ensures that affected individuals have an opportunity to contest the decision and potentially have it overturned if they can demonstrate that the disqualification was unjust.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Corporate Law & Governance
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.