NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Sharon Dunn WOODVALE WA 6026 |
|
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 27th day of November 2015
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Ian Ross
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address significant governance and regulatory issues within the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act establishes a framework for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry, focusing on the governance, administration, and operation of superannuation entities. It was designed to ensure that these entities operate in a manner that safeguards the financial well-being and rights of members. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain high standards of conduct and compliance within the industry, thereby fostering trust and confidence in superannuation arrangements. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have acted in a manner that warrants such action, ensuring that responsible officers do not engage in conduct that could harm the interests of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the administration and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia, impacting a wide range of entities and individuals. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, including corporate trustees, of superannuation entities, as well as responsible officers of these trustees. This encompasses various conduct and transactions within the superannuation industry, such as the management and investment of superannuation funds. The Act's jurisdiction extends nationally, applying across the Commonwealth, states, and territories of Australia. However, the Act does not explicitly outline exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, indicating a broad application unless otherwise specified through subordinate instruments. In this instance, the notice of disqualification under the Act is directed at an individual, Mrs. Sharon Dunn, who was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act, leading to her disqualification. The application of the Act is further extended by the possibility of the disqualification being revoked on the initiative of the Commissioner or by application from the disqualified person, and the availability of a reconsideration process for those dissatisfied with the decision.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) pertinent to this notice of disqualification are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Subsection 126A(2) empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies the disqualification. Subsection 126A(6) mandates the delegate to provide the disqualified individual with a notice detailing the reasons for the disqualification and the effective date of the order. The notice to Mrs Sharon Dunn, issued by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner, follows this statutory requirement, informing her that she has been disqualified because the corporate trustee for which she served as a responsible officer contravened the SISA and the seriousness of these contraventions warrants her disqualification.
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Primarily, it requires corporate trustees to comply with the provisions of the Act, which include maintaining proper records, ensuring the lawful and prudent management of superannuation entities, and acting in the best interests of members. A responsible officer, such as Mrs Dunn, is expected to oversee these compliance activities and ensure that the corporate trustee adheres to the stipulated standards. Any failure to meet these obligations can result in the corporate trustee being in breach of the SISA, thereby exposing responsible officers to potential disqualification.
In terms of consequences for breach, subsection 126A(2) of the SISA stipulates that a responsible officer can be disqualified if the corporate trustee contravenes the Act and the officer was aware of or should have been aware of the contraventions at the time they occurred. The notice to Mrs Dunn indicates that she has been disqualified for such reasons. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, any person affected by the disqualification can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing reasons for the request. This reconsideration process offers a pathway for the affected party to contest the disqualification if they believe it to be unjust or erroneous. The potential civil and administrative consequences of being disqualified include being barred from participating in the management of superannuation entities, which can have significant professional and financial repercussions for the individual.