NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mrs Shao-Pang Mok
HEATHERTON VIC 3202
I, Ivan Parrett, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee, investment manager, custodian or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SIS Act.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 11 September 2013
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry. This legislation was introduced to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and that trustees act in the best interests of members. The Act established the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) as the primary regulator of superannuation funds and introduced provisions for the disqualification of individuals who do not meet the fit and proper person requirements. The policy objective of the Act is to protect the financial interests of superannuation members by ensuring high standards of conduct and compliance within the industry. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have breached superannuation laws or are otherwise deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of millions of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates managing superannuation funds. The Act has a national reach, operating across all states and territories in Australia. The legislation allows for disqualification of individuals deemed unfit or involved in contraventions of the Act, as evidenced by the disqualification notice served on Mrs Shao-Pang Mok. The notice indicates that Mrs Mok has been disqualified from holding any position of responsibility within a superannuation entity due to breaches of the Act by the corporate trustee and her unsuitability for such roles. The disqualification is effective immediately upon the notice date, and the decision can be appealed or reconsidered within 21 days by the affected party. The Act also permits the revocation of disqualification orders either by the authority or upon application by the disqualified individual. The notice of disqualification will be published in the Gazette as required by the Act.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the notice, under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), are sections 126A(2) and 126A(3). Section 126A(2) provides the authority to disqualify an individual from being a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity if there is evidence that the corporate trustee has contravened the SIS Act and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. Section 126A(3) allows for disqualification if it is determined that the individual is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position.
Under these sections, the obligations imposed on Mrs Shao-Pang Mok include the immediate cessation of any role as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of any superannuation entity. This disqualification is effective from the date the notice is made, which is 11 September 2013. Additionally, the notice specifies that details of this disqualification will be published in the Gazette as required by section 126A(7) of the SIS Act. Mrs Shao-Pang Mok also has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days, as per section 344 of the SIS Act.
The notice also outlines the potential for revocation of the disqualification order. According to subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by Mrs Shao-Pang Mok. This provides a mechanism for the individual to seek reinstatement should circumstances change or if new information comes to light that might warrant reconsideration of the disqualification.
In terms of consequences for breach, the notice does not specify penalties for non-compliance with the disqualification order. However, generally, under the SIS Act, failure to comply with disqualification orders can lead to civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach and the specific provisions of the Act that are contravened. The exact penalties would be determined based on the nature of the contravention and the discretion of the court.