NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Shane Northam - 29 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Shane Northam
CAVENDISH VIC 3314
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 29 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debbi Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect superannuation beneficiaries and ensure the integrity and efficiency of the industry. The Act addresses the need for stringent oversight and regulation of entities involved in superannuation to prevent misconduct and financial mismanagement. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing licensing requirements and compliance obligations on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act also provides mechanisms for enforcement and disqualification of individuals who engage in serious misconduct, ensuring that those who breach their duties are held accountable. This legislative framework is crucial for maintaining public confidence in the superannuation system and protecting the financial security of millions of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring that these entities comply with the regulatory standards governing the superannuation industry. This Act has a national jurisdictional reach, impacting entities across Australia as it is a Commonwealth Act. The Act’s primary objective is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry by regulating the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The legislation extends its application to individuals who have contravened the Act’s provisions, particularly when they were serving as responsible officers at the time of the contraventions. Notably, the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, but it does provide a mechanism for revocation of disqualification under certain conditions. Additionally, the Act may extend its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations that further define the responsibilities and obligations of those involved in the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines specific provisions regarding the disqualification of individuals involved in the management of superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can issue a notice of disqualification if they are satisfied that a corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the individual, who was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions, warrants disqualification due to the seriousness of the breaches. In this case, Shane Northam has been disqualified under these provisions because he was a responsible officer when the contraventions occurred.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, responsible officers must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid personal disqualification. They must be vigilant in overseeing the operations of superannuation entities and take corrective action when necessary. The SISA also mandates that any contraventions of the Act must be reported and rectified to prevent further breaches. Moreover, entities must maintain accurate records and provide necessary information to the Commissioner of Taxation upon request.
Violating the provisions of the SISA can lead to significant consequences. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, while knowing they are disqualified. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is a two-year jail term. Additionally, any publication of the disqualification under subsection 126A(7) will serve as a public notice of the individual's disqualification, which could have further repercussions for their professional standing.
For Shane Northam, who has been disqualified, there are avenues for recourse. Under section 344 of the SISA, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and should include the reasons he believes the decision is incorrect. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or based on a written application by Shane Northam himself.