NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Shane Christopher Buttel - 16 January 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Shane Christopher Buttel
Shell Cove NSW 2529
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 January 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debbi Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to establish a framework for the supervision of superannuation entities and to provide for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that these entities are managed responsibly and in compliance with legal requirements. The SISA was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory system to oversee the superannuation industry, which is crucial for the financial security of millions of Australians. The Act is overseen by the Parliament of Australia, with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system.
The SISA includes provisions for disqualifying individuals from being involved in the management of superannuation entities if they have been found to contravene the Act's requirements. This legislative tool is intended to deter misconduct and ensure that only fit and proper persons manage superannuation funds. The case of Shane Christopher Buttel exemplifies the application of these provisions, where he has been disqualified due to his role in the corporate trustee's contraventions of the SISA. This disqualification is a direct consequence of the serious nature of the breaches, underscoring the Act's commitment to enforcing compliance and safeguarding the interests of superannuation members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) governs the operations and oversight of superannuation entities within Australia, encompassing both corporate and individual trustees, as well as their responsible officers. The Act applies to entities managing superannuation funds and their officers, including those involved in the administration, investment, or custody of superannuation assets. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories within Australia. Notably, the Act includes provisions for disqualifying responsible officers who have been involved in the contravention of its provisions. This disqualification serves to prevent individuals from engaging in the management of superannuation entities if their past conduct warrants such a measure. The Act also specifies that a disqualified person who knowingly acts in contravention of their disqualification is liable to criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to two years. The Act’s provisions can be further extended or detailed through subordinate instruments, which may provide additional guidelines or clarifications on the implementation of the Act’s provisions. The notice of disqualification, as exemplified in the case of Shane Christopher Buttel, is a critical enforcement mechanism under the Act, ensuring compliance and maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides various provisions concerning the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities. Section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must notify a disqualified person of their disqualification in writing, as exemplified in the notice given to Shane Christopher Buttel. Under section 126A(2), a person can be disqualified if they are a responsible officer of a corporate trustee and the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, with the seriousness of the contraventions providing grounds for disqualification. The disqualification takes immediate effect from the date of the notice.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on entities and individuals include ensuring that responsible officers are aware of the legal requirements and comply with them. For responsible officers, this includes monitoring the activities of the corporate trustee to ensure adherence to the SISA. Any contraventions by the trustee must be reported and rectified promptly to avoid disqualification. Furthermore, under section 126K, disqualified individuals are prohibited from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or from being responsible officers of entities that serve in these roles. The SISA also stipulates that any disqualification notice is to be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, as per section 126A(7).
In the event of a breach, the SISA imposes severe penalties. Under section 126K, a disqualified person who knowingly acts in any capacity related to superannuation entities faces significant consequences. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term, underscoring the seriousness of non-compliance. Additionally, the SISA allows for the revocation of a disqualification, either at the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified person, as per subsection 126A(5). Individuals dissatisfied with the disqualification can request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344. This process provides a formal avenue for challenging the decision and seeking its review.