NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Sergey Poberezovskiy
Hampton East VIC 3188
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 January 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper administration and regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act was introduced to address the need for effective oversight of the superannuation industry to protect the interests of members and beneficiaries. The Parliament of Australia enacted this legislation to establish a regulatory framework that promotes the responsible and efficient management of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain and enhance the integrity of the superannuation system, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of members and are used for the purposes intended by the legislation. The Act provides for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as the imposition of penalties for non-compliance and the disqualification of individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees in the superannuation industry, particularly those who have contravened the provisions of the Act. In the case of Sergey Poberezovskiy, a resident of Hampton East in Victoria, the Act has been invoked due to his role as a responsible officer during instances of non-compliance by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities. The Act's jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, impacting entities and individuals engaged in superannuation activities. Exclusions or exemptions are not explicitly detailed in the notice, but the Act's broad scope suggests it encompasses a wide range of conduct and transactions within the superannuation sector. Additionally, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, although specifics of such instruments are not detailed in the notice provided.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if the officer is deemed to have allowed contraventions of the Act by the trustee. Section 126A(6) mandates the notification of such disqualification, and section 126A(7) requires that details of the disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. Furthermore, section 126K prohibits a disqualified person from engaging in certain activities related to superannuation entities, such as acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For example, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the SISA, including the avoidance of any actions that might lead to the contravention of the Act by their entities. Additionally, the Act mandates that any disqualified person must refrain from engaging in the prohibited activities outlined in section 126K. The Act also requires the Commissioner of Taxation to notify the disqualified individual of the disqualification and the reasons for it, as seen in the notice given to Sergey Poberezovskiy.
The Act also provides for serious consequences for breaches of its provisions. According to section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such an entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term. This serves as a strong deterrent against non-compliance and underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats its provisions.
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provides a potential pathway for Sergey Poberezovskiy to seek reinstatement if he believes the disqualification was unjust. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, Sergey Poberezovskiy has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This reconsideration must be requested in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must detail the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect.