NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – SCOTT MCFADZEAN – 1 May 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
SCOTT MCFADZEAN
REDHEAD NSW 2290
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 May 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide for the supervision of the superannuation industry and to ensure the proper administration of superannuation funds. This Act addresses the problem of misconduct by responsible officers within superannuation entities, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was introduced by the Australian Parliament, with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system by holding responsible officers accountable for any breaches of the Act. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from acting as responsible officers if there are serious contraventions of the Act by the corporate trustee they represent. This legislative measure ensures that those responsible for the administration of superannuation funds are held to high standards of conduct and accountability.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees managing superannuation entities. This Act has a national reach, applying across Australia, and imposes significant obligations and restrictions on those involved in the supervision and administration of superannuation funds. The Act prohibits disqualified persons from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or from being responsible officers of entities that perform these roles, with serious legal consequences for non-compliance. The geographic jurisdiction of the SISA extends across all states and territories in Australia, ensuring consistent enforcement and regulation of superannuation practices nationwide. Notably, the Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, which can provide further detail or clarification on specific aspects of the legislation. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act are not explicitly stated in the notice, but the severe penalties for breaches, including potential imprisonment, underscore the importance of strict compliance.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Section 126A(2) provides the authority for disqualifying a person who meets the specified criteria, while section 126A(6) mandates that the disqualification notice be given to the individual concerned, as demonstrated in the notice to Scott McFadzean. Section 126A(7) stipulates that details of the disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Under the SISA, Scott McFadzean, as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities, faces certain obligations and requirements. The Act requires him to ensure that the corporate trustee adheres to all regulatory standards and provisions outlined in the SISA. If the corporate trustee contravenes the Act, and Scott McFadzean was a responsible officer at the time, this grounds the potential disqualification under the Act.
The SISA imposes significant consequences for breaches, as outlined in section 126K. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is imprisonment for up to two years. Additionally, section 126A(5) allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Scott McFadzean. Finally, section 344 provides a mechanism for Scott McFadzean to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision if he is not satisfied with it, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice.