NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – SAMARA JAYNE THOMPSON - 17 June 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Samara Jayne Thompson
PARK AVENUE QLD 4701
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) and 126A(3).
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you aren’t a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 June 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Cameron Watson
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed responsibly and in the best interests of members. This Act aims to address issues of governance and integrity within the superannuation sector by establishing a framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, including provisions for disqualifying individuals who are unfit to manage these entities. The enactment of the SISA was driven by a need to protect superannuation funds and the financial interests of members, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers adhere to stringent standards of conduct and compliance. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by preventing and addressing misconduct and mismanagement within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate entities that manage superannuation funds, including trustees, responsible officers, investment managers, and custodians. This federal legislation governs the conduct and operations of superannuation entities to ensure the protection and proper management of superannuation funds. The Act’s jurisdiction extends across Australia, with its provisions applicable to all states and territories, thereby ensuring a uniform regulatory environment for superannuation trustees and officers. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions but sets out strict criteria for disqualifying individuals from holding responsible positions within superannuation entities if they are deemed unfit or have contravened the Act’s provisions. The application and scope of the Act may be further defined or extended through subordinate instruments, which can introduce additional regulations or clarifications to support the overarching objectives of the Act.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the notice of disqualification issued to Samara Jayne Thompson under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) include subsections 126A(2), 126A(3), and 126A(6). These sections require that Samara Jayne Thompson has been disqualified from holding any position as a trustee, responsible officer, or similar role in a superannuation entity due to the contraventions by the corporate trustee for which she was responsible at the time. The disqualification is made effective on the date the notice is issued, which in this case is 17 June 2026.
The notice of disqualification imposes obligations on Samara Jayne Thompson by explicitly prohibiting her from acting or being appointed as a trustee, responsible officer, or in any similar capacity within a superannuation entity. The obligations extend to ensuring she does not contravene the SISA in any future role within the superannuation industry. Additionally, the notice informs her of the grounds for the disqualification, which include the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee and her unfitness to hold such a position.
Failure to comply with the disqualification may result in serious legal consequences. Section 126K of the SISA sets out that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act or be appointed as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for up to two years. This underscores the seriousness with which the SISA treats breaches of its provisions and the importance of adhering to the imposed disqualification.
There are also provisions for the disqualification to be potentially revoked. According to subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application from the disqualified person, Samara Jayne Thompson. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA allows for the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification decision if she is dissatisfied with it, provided that a written request is made within 21 days of receiving the notice, detailing the reasons for her dissatisfaction. These provisions offer a formal avenue for reconsideration and potential reinstatement if certain conditions are met.