NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Samantha Burr
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Samantha Burr
MOUNT HICKS TAS 7325
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 3 May 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Ravi Narayanan
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and beneficiaries. The SISA was introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament to create a regulatory framework that maintains the integrity, efficiency, and stability of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by promoting high standards of conduct and accountability among trustees, investment managers, and other responsible officers within the superannuation industry. Under the Act, individuals such as Samantha Burr can be disqualified from holding certain positions if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act while acting as responsible officers of corporate trustees. This disqualification serves as a deterrent against misconduct and ensures that only individuals of good standing manage superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. This Act has a national reach, operating across all jurisdictions within Australia, including the Commonwealth, states, and territories, and is aimed at ensuring the proper administration and compliance of superannuation funds. The Act imposes various obligations and duties on these entities and individuals, and it provides for disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its provisions. The disqualification process under the Act can be initiated by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation if they are satisfied that a contravention has occurred while the individual was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contravention warrants such action. The disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, the Act outlines penalties for offences, including potential imprisonment of up to two years for a disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this disqualification notice are subsection 126A(6) and subsection 126A(2). These sections enable a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person if they have been a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that has contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualification. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon its issuance. Samantha Burr has been formally notified of her disqualification by Emma Rosenzweig, who is acting as a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The notice includes details of the contraventions and grounds for disqualification, and informs Samantha that she cannot act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, nor be a responsible officer of such entities.
The SISA imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs, including responsible officers of corporate trustees. These obligations are designed to ensure compliance with the Act and the proper management of superannuation funds. Responsible officers must adhere to the SISA’s provisions, which include requirements for the prudent management of superannuation funds, disclosure of information to members, and maintaining adequate records. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in disqualification, as evidenced by Samantha Burr’s case. The Act also mandates that any contraventions by corporate trustees be reported, and that responsible officers take steps to rectify any breaches.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can result in significant consequences, both civil and criminal. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such entities. This offence carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for Samantha to request reconsideration of the disqualification decision if she believes it to be unjust. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must detail the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.
The notice also highlights the possibility of disqualification revocation under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, which can occur either at the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provides a potential pathway for Samantha to seek reinstatement of her eligibility to act in the specified capacities within the superannuation industry, subject to meeting any conditions set by the Commissioner. Furthermore, the details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, ensuring transparency and public notification of such decisions.