NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Salvatore Arcuri
NORMANHURST NSW 2076
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 May 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per William Keating
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that it operates in a fair, efficient, and transparent manner. The Act was introduced to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of superannuation entities to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. Enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, the SISA establishes a framework for the regulation of superannuation funds, trustees, and related entities, with a policy objective of maintaining the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The legislation aims to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons, thereby mitigating risks associated with the management and administration of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities that are involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities in Australia. This legislation ensures that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons to hold these roles, which involves assessing their integrity, competence, and suitability. The disqualification provisions of the SISA allow for the removal of individuals deemed unfit from these roles, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying to all superannuation entities within Australia, regardless of state or territory jurisdiction. Notably, the Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and guidelines, which provide further detail on the criteria for determining fitness and properness. Additionally, the Act includes specific exclusions and exemptions where necessary, although the primary focus remains on maintaining high standards of conduct and responsibility within the superannuation industry. The enforcement of these standards includes significant penalties, including potential jail time, for those who knowingly contravene the disqualification provisions.
Key Provisions
The key provision in this Notice of Disqualification is section 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), which mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give a disqualified person notice of their disqualification. In this case, Salvatore Arcuri has been notified of their disqualification by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner, under subsection 126A(6). The disqualification arises from subsection 126A(3) of the SISA, which allows for the disqualification of individuals who are not deemed fit and proper to be a trustee or responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice.
The Act imposes specific obligations on disqualified individuals like Salvatore Arcuri. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This prohibition extends to any body corporate where the disqualified person holds a responsible officer position. The notice serves as a formal declaration of these obligations and the consequences of non-compliance.
Breaching the provisions of section 126K can result in serious consequences. The Act imposes a criminal offence for knowingly acting in any of the prohibited roles while being disqualified. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification and highlights the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance.
Additionally, the Notice mentions the possibility of revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. The disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for review, allowing the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification decision if the affected person submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice. This review process must include the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect.