NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Sailendra Kundrapu
WAKLEY HEIGHTS SA 5098
I, James O’Halloran a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 31 October 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernard Morrison
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons. The enactment was driven by the need to address issues related to the suitability and integrity of individuals managing superannuation funds, thereby maintaining the financial stability and security of retirement savings. The Act was passed by the Parliament of Australia and includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit for such roles. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the superannuation industry and the superannuation savings of Australians by enforcing strict standards for those in supervisory roles within superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities in Australia. Specifically, the Act governs the conduct and responsibilities of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers within the superannuation industry. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, applying across all states and territories in Australia. The Act imposes disqualification on individuals deemed unfit and proper to hold positions of trust or responsibility within a superannuation entity, ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. The Act also provides for the revocation of disqualification and allows for reconsideration of decisions made under its provisions. Subordinate instruments may further detail specific processes and procedures related to the administration of the Act.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for the disqualification of individuals from holding certain positions within superannuation entities. Section 126A(3) and 126A(6) empower a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual if they are not deemed a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee of a superannuation entity. The notice of disqualification, as seen in the document, informs Mr Sailendra Kundrapu that he has been disqualified under these provisions because the delegate is satisfied that he does not meet the required standards.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on individuals such as Mr Kundrapu include adherence to the fit and proper person test for positions of trust or responsibility within superannuation entities. Failure to meet this standard can result in immediate disqualification and the prohibition from acting in any capacity that involves the management or oversight of superannuation funds. This ensures that only individuals who are deemed reliable and trustworthy manage superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation members.
The SISA also outlines the consequences for breach of the disqualification provisions. Section 126K of the Act makes it an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of complying with the disqualification provisions and the potential legal repercussions for non-compliance.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for the revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This allows for the possibility of reinstatement if the individual can demonstrate that they are now fit and proper to hold such positions. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides for reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the initial decision, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification. This ensures that there is a process in place for reviewing and potentially overturning the decision if new information or arguments are presented.