NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Roy Fraser
South Lake WA 6164
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 August 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michelle Nourse
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework aimed at ensuring the integrity and efficient operation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The legislation addresses issues and gaps in the supervision and regulation of superannuation entities, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. This Act is enacted by the Australian Parliament and its policy objective is to maintain high standards of governance and accountability within the superannuation sector. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act, ensuring that those entrusted with managing superannuation funds meet certain professional and ethical standards. The recent disqualification of Mr Roy Fraser exemplifies the Act's role in enforcing compliance and maintaining the integrity of the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act has a national reach, governing conduct and transactions across Australia under Commonwealth jurisdiction. It specifically targets those who contravene the provisions of the Act, providing grounds for disqualification if the contraventions are of sufficient nature, seriousness, and frequency. The disqualification prohibits the disqualified individual or entity from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such a role. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualification under certain conditions and provides avenues for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within a specified period. Furthermore, the Act stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue in their role, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Details of such disqualifications are subject to publication in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act. Specifically, section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of a person from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry, and section 126A(6) mandates that a formal notice of disqualification be issued to the person in question. In this case, the notice was issued to Mr. Roy Fraser, informing him that he has been disqualified from his position. This disqualification is due to the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation being satisfied that Mr. Fraser has contravened the SISA on multiple occasions, with the nature, seriousness, and number of these contraventions justifying the disqualification. The disqualification takes immediate effect on the date the notice is issued.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For example, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles. This section aims to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to influence or manage superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of fund members. Additionally, section 344 provides a mechanism for the Commissioner to reconsider a disqualification decision if the affected person submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, outlining the reasons they believe the decision is incorrect.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA can result in serious consequences. Section 126K outlines an offence for which the maximum penalty is two years imprisonment, applicable to any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a restricted capacity within the superannuation industry. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the Act’s requirements and the serious repercussions of non-compliance. Furthermore, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the delegate or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This flexibility ensures that the disqualification can be adjusted based on subsequent conduct or changes in circumstances.