NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ms Rose Marra
SPOTSWOOD VIC 3015
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature, seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 1 June 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Grivell
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a regulatory framework that ensures the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities, safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act was introduced to address the need for a robust system to monitor and regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees act in the best interests of fund members and adhere to legislative requirements. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, protecting members' retirement savings from mismanagement and misconduct by trustees. This notice of disqualification under the SISA serves to uphold these objectives by barring individuals found to have breached the Act's provisions from performing responsible roles within superannuation entities, thereby enforcing accountability and compliance within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate trustees involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia. This Act, which is a Commonwealth legislation, regulates the conduct of trustees, directors, and other responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act extends to all superannuation entities, irrespective of the state or territory in which they operate, thereby covering the entire nation. It encompasses a broad range of conduct and transactions related to the management and operation of superannuation funds, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act allows for the disqualification of responsible officers found to have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Ms Rose Marra. Exclusions and exemptions from the Act are generally limited, with specific thresholds and conditions outlined in the Act itself or through subordinate instruments, which may further detail application and enforcement mechanisms.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions for the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees who have contravened the Act. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified if the corporate trustee has contravened the Act on one or more occasions, and the officer was responsible at the time of the contraventions. The nature, seriousness, and number of the contraventions must provide sufficient grounds for the disqualification. In this case, Ms. Rose Marra has been disqualified by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Firstly, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure that their entities comply with the provisions of the SISA. This includes maintaining adequate records, reporting requirements, and adhering to the standards set out in the Act. Additionally, responsible officers must act in the best interests of the superannuation fund members and avoid conflicts of interest. The obligations also include taking reasonable steps to prevent contraventions and promptly addressing any issues that arise.
Failure to comply with the SISA can result in various consequences. Section 126A of the Act provides for disqualification of responsible officers, as seen in the case of Ms. Rose Marra. The Act also includes provisions for penalties and enforcement actions against corporate trustees and responsible officers who contravene its provisions. These can include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the nature and severity of the offence. The specific penalties are outlined in the relevant sections of the Act, and the maximum penalties are stated where applicable.
Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified person. If a person is dissatisfied with the decision to disqualify them, they have the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, as provided under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be in writing and include the reasons for the reconsideration. The Act thus provides mechanisms for both the enforcement of its provisions and avenues for appeal or rectification for those affected by its decisions.