Notice of Disqualification – Rosalind Russell – 25 January 2024

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2024N00109 In force Notifiable Instrument

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Rosalind Russell – 25 January 2024

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Rosalind Russell

ZURICH 8008 SWITZERLAND

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.

I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’re not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 25 January 2024

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Jaq McDougall


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act aims to ensure that superannuation trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of members, which includes promoting and protecting the financial welfare of members. The SISA was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to fill a significant gap in the regulation of the superannuation industry, which was crucial given the increasing importance of superannuation in the Australian financial system. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain and enhance the integrity of the superannuation industry by ensuring that those in key roles are fit and proper persons, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation members. This legislation empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from being trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities if they are deemed not to be fit and proper persons. Such disqualifications are intended to safeguard the financial security and trust placed in the superannuation system by ensuring only suitable individuals manage these critical roles. The Act also provides mechanisms for the disqualification to be revoked under certain conditions and allows for legal recourse for those who feel their disqualification is unjust. This comprehensive approach underscores the importance of maintaining high standards of conduct and responsibility within the superannuation industry.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to trustees, responsible officers, and entities within the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act extends to the Commonwealth, encompassing all aspects of superannuation entities and their governance structures. It includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who are deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities, such as Rosalind Russell in this notice. The disqualification is imposed when it is established that the individual is not a fit and proper person to hold such roles, based on criteria stipulated in the Act. This action is intended to maintain the integrity and proper administration of superannuation funds. The Act also stipulates that disqualified persons are prohibited from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, with serious penalties, including potential imprisonment, for violations. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance, and details are made public as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. The Act allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification either through an application by the disqualified person or on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation. Additionally, it provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected individual is dissatisfied with the outcome.

Key Provisions

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains specific provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities. In this instance, Rosalind Russell has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA. This disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(6)), and it is based on the finding that Rosalind is not a fit and proper person to serve as a trustee or responsible officer of a body corporate involved with superannuation entities. The Act imposes a series of obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For individuals like Rosalind, who have been disqualified, there is a clear prohibition from acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such roles (section 126K). This restriction is intended to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members and ensure the integrity of the superannuation system. Failure to adhere to these provisions can lead to significant legal consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a prohibited capacity commits an offence, which is punishable by up to two years in jail (subsection 126K). This severe penalty underscores the importance of compliance with the Act’s requirements and the seriousness of attempting to circumvent disqualification orders. Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for review and potential revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or following a written application by the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for reconsideration and potential reinstatement if circumstances change. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for reconsideration by the Commissioner if the disqualified person believes the decision to be incorrect, provided a written request is made within 21 days of receiving the notice, detailing the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Notifiable Instrument
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Prohibited Conduct
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.