NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Ronald Martin
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ronald Martin
KWINANA WA 6966
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 June 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bharti Ben
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address issues of governance and financial integrity within the superannuation industry. The SISA was introduced to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with high standards of care, skill, and diligence, and to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. One of the key mechanisms in the SISA is the ability to disqualify individuals who have been responsible officers of corporate trustees that have contravened the provisions of the Act. This disqualification is intended to deter non-compliance and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. Under the SISA, a person may be disqualified if they were a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that has contravened the Act and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such a measure. The disqualification is enforceable and can be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, with potential criminal penalties for those who knowingly act in contravention of the Act while disqualified. The Act also provides for the possibility of revoking a disqualification under certain conditions and allows for reconsideration of a decision by the Commissioner if a disqualified person believes it to be unjust.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate trustees involved in the management of superannuation entities in Australia. The Act imposes disqualification powers on the Commissioner of Taxation to prevent individuals who have engaged in serious misconduct from participating in the superannuation industry. This notice, issued under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, informs Ronald Martin that he has been disqualified due to his role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance and restricts Ronald Martin from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer of any body corporate involved in these capacities, as per section 126K of the SISA. The Act's reach is national, applying across all states and territories in Australia. The disqualification can be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or following a written application by the disqualified person, as outlined in subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. If Ronald Martin is dissatisfied with the decision, he can request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, in accordance with section 344 of the SISA.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unsuitable to manage superannuation entities. Specifically, subsection 126A(2) of the Act allows for the disqualification of a person if the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the Act and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions, with the seriousness of the contraventions warranting such action. In this case, Ronald Martin has been disqualified by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Emma Rosenzweig, because it has been established that he was a responsible officer when the corporate trustee contravened the SISA. This disqualification is immediate and effective from the date of the notice, which is 21 June 2023.
The Act imposes several obligations on entities and individuals within the superannuation industry. For instance, responsible officers must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid disqualification. Additionally, trustees and other governing bodies of superannuation entities are required to adhere to the provisions of the Act, including maintaining proper records, reporting requirements, and ensuring the prudent management of superannuation funds. These obligations are intended to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system.
Section 126K of the SISA sets out the penalties for any disqualified person who knowingly acts or is involved in the management of a superannuation entity in a prohibited capacity. Such an offence is a serious breach, with the potential for a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This serves as a deterrent against non-compliance and reinforces the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Act. The seriousness of this penalty underscores the need for compliance and the potential legal consequences of breaching the Act’s provisions.
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification of an individual can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provides a pathway for reinstatement, contingent on the individual demonstrating that the circumstances warranting the disqualification no longer apply. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for an internal review of the disqualification decision. If Ronald Martin or any affected party is dissatisfied with the disqualification, they can request a reconsideration within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided that they submit a written request outlining the reasons for their dissatisfaction. This mechanism ensures that there is an opportunity for review and potentially for rectification of the decision if it is found to be unjust or based on incorrect information.