NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Rolando Oculam
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Rolando Oculam
SEVILLE GROVE WA 6112
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 December 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Ravi Narayananan
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring compliance with standards that protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This Act was introduced to address the need for robust oversight in the management of superannuation entities, which handle significant amounts of personal savings and investments. The enactment of this legislation was by the Australian Parliament, aiming to maintain the integrity and efficiency of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the Act includes ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation members. This legislative framework is pivotal in preventing misconduct and enhancing the accountability of those responsible for managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, imposing obligations and restrictions on their conduct to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act's jurisdiction is national, with its provisions enforced across Australia. The SISA mandates disqualification of individuals who, while acting as responsible officers of corporate trustees, contravene the Act's provisions, providing grounds for such action. The disqualification extends to preventing the disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as well as from being associated with any body corporate in these roles. This disqualification is not only a punitive measure but also serves to protect the superannuation industry and its beneficiaries from potential misconduct. The Act may also revoke the disqualification under certain conditions, and offers a process for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes various provisions to ensure the proper administration and oversight of superannuation entities in Australia. Under section 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, in this case Emma Rosenzweig, can disqualify a person from being a responsible officer if they are satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA. This particular notice (C2022G01231) addresses the disqualification of Rolando Oculam, who was found to be a responsible officer during the contraventions by the corporate trustee.
The disqualification imposed on Rolando Oculam under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA signifies that he is no longer eligible to act in a responsible capacity within a superannuation entity. This disqualification arises from the multiple contraventions committed by the corporate trustee while Oculam was in office, and the nature of these contraventions justifies his removal from the role. This disqualification is immediate and takes effect on the date of the notice, which in this case is 7 December 2022.
The Act imposes several obligations on the disqualified person. Firstly, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The penalties for this offence are severe, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This ensures that individuals who have been disqualified are held accountable and deterred from reoffending. Furthermore, the notice indicates that the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such actions.
There are also provisions for the potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or based on a written application from the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for Rolando Oculam to potentially reinstate his eligibility, subject to meeting the necessary criteria. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for Rolando Oculam to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if he is dissatisfied with the disqualification. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for the dissatisfaction. This process ensures that there is a fair and accessible avenue for review.