NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – RODNEY JAMES STELLING
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Rodney James Stelling
HIGHETT VIC 3190
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 25 October 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation aims to ensure that superannuation funds are managed prudently and in the best interests of the fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament and establishes a framework for the oversight and regulation of superannuation entities, trustees, and responsible officers. The policy objective of the Act is to protect the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage these funds act with integrity and competence. In this context, the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act, thereby safeguarding the interests of fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees in the superannuation industry, aiming to ensure compliance with the regulatory framework governing superannuation entities. The Act imposes a disqualification on Rodney James Stelling due to his role as a responsible officer when the corporate trustee contravened the SISA. The disqualification is effective immediately upon notice and prohibits Mr. Stelling from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer of such a body corporate. This legislation has a Commonwealth reach, extending across Australia and applying to all entities within the superannuation industry. The Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, although no specific exclusions or exemptions are mentioned in the provided notice. Should Mr. Stelling wish to challenge the decision, he can request a reconsideration within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SISA. Additionally, it is an offence under section 126K for a disqualified person to act in any capacity mentioned, with a penalty of up to two years in jail.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this disqualification notice are subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(2), the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify a person from being a responsible officer of a superannuation entity if there are serious contraventions of the Act by the corporate trustee while the person was a responsible officer. Subsection 126A(6) requires the Commissioner to provide notice of the disqualification to the affected person, which is what is outlined in the notice to Rodney James Stelling. The notice specifies that Rodney has been disqualified from being a responsible officer due to serious contraventions by the corporate trustee while he held that position.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on responsible officers of corporate trustees. They are expected to ensure that the corporate trustee complies with the SISA, which includes meeting all regulatory and compliance requirements, properly managing the superannuation funds, and maintaining adequate records and reporting. Failure to fulfil these duties or oversight of serious breaches by the corporate trustee can lead to personal disqualification, as experienced by Rodney James Stelling. The Act also mandates that corporate trustees must operate within the legal framework set by the SISA, with the responsible officer playing a crucial role in governance and compliance.
Breaching the terms of the disqualification can lead to serious legal consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person who knows of their disqualification to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the severity of ignoring the disqualification. Additionally, Rodney has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This process provides an opportunity for Rodney to contest the decision if he believes it to be unjust or incorrect.