NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Rodney Colliss - 21 February 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Rodney Colliss
VINCENTIA NSW 2540
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 21 February 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pam Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons of why you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for effective supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of superannuation fund members. The act establishes a framework to regulate the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, with a focus on maintaining the integrity and financial stability of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the act is to protect the superannuation savings of Australians by ensuring that those who manage these funds do so responsibly and in compliance with legal standards. The act provides for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds due to serious breaches of the law, as seen in the case of Rodney Colliss, who has been disqualified under the act for his role in contraventions committed by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, it pertains to responsible officers of corporate trustees, trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. The Act operates at the Commonwealth level, ensuring consistent regulation across Australia. Its primary aim is to protect superannuation fund members by enforcing compliance and imposing penalties for serious breaches. The Act’s scope is broad, extending to various conduct and transactions within the superannuation industry, including the management and investment of superannuation assets. However, the Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, providing further clarification and specific rules within its framework. Any individual disqualified under the Act is prohibited from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation sector, and failure to comply can result in criminal penalties, including imprisonment. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications, either by the delegate or upon application by the disqualified person, and provides a process for reconsideration of decisions made under the Act.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of a person if the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity has contravened the SISA and the person was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. The seriousness of these contraventions must also provide grounds for disqualification. In this case, Rodney Colliss has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, due to his role as a responsible officer during the contraventions by the corporate trustee.
The obligations imposed by the Act on individuals like Rodney Colliss include refraining from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian, if they are disqualified. This prohibition is critical to ensure that those who have demonstrated unsuitability through their past actions do not continue to manage superannuation entities. Additionally, under section 126K, it is a legal requirement for disqualified individuals to comply with these restrictions to avoid criminal liability.
Failure to comply with the disqualification can lead to severe consequences. As outlined in section 126K, knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity is an offence. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment, reflecting the seriousness of bypassing disqualification orders. Furthermore, the disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. If Rodney Colliss wishes to appeal the decision, he must make a written request to the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, as stipulated in section 344, providing reasons for his dissatisfaction with the decision.