NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - ROBIN PIETERSIE - 6 February 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
ROBIN PIETERSIE
BANKSIA BEACH QLD 4507
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 6 February 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Christiane Boissezon
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to establish a regulatory framework governing the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring compliance and the proper management of superannuation funds. This Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation within the superannuation sector, given its significant role in providing retirement income for Australians. The SISA is administered by the Commissioner of Taxation, with the policy objective of safeguarding the financial welfare of superannuation fund members through stringent supervision and enforcement mechanisms. This legislative instrument provides for the disqualification of individuals who have breached the provisions of the SISA, ensuring that those responsible for managing superannuation funds adhere to the highest standards of conduct and compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, operating under the Commonwealth framework, and its provisions extend to all states and territories in Australia. The Act targets conduct and transactions within the superannuation industry, aiming to ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds. The notice of disqualification serves to bar individuals, such as Robin Pietersie, from participating in the superannuation industry if there is evidence of contraventions under the Act, particularly if the seriousness of such contraventions warrants disqualification. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance and will be published in the Federal Register of Legislation as a Notifiable Instrument. Additionally, any disqualified person found to be acting in contravention of the Act, knowing they are disqualified, can face criminal charges and a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Commissioner has the authority to reconsider the decision if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, outlining the reasons for dissatisfaction with the disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for the disqualification of individuals involved in the management of superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA, the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify individuals from performing certain roles if they are found to have contravened the SISA. In this case, Robin Pietersie has been disqualified under this subsection, with the notice of disqualification taking effect immediately upon issuance (subsection 126A(6)). This disqualification arises from the Commissioner's satisfaction that Robin Pietersie's contraventions of the SISA were serious enough to warrant such action.
Disqualification under the SISA imposes strict obligations on the individual in question. Notably, section 126K of the SISA prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles. Any contravention of this prohibition is an offence under the Act, with a potential penalty of up to two years in jail (subsection 126K). This stringent prohibition aims to safeguard the integrity of the superannuation industry by ensuring that only individuals of good standing manage superannuation entities.
The SISA also provides mechanisms for potential revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the Commissioner may revoke a disqualification either on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified individual. This flexibility allows for reconsideration of disqualification if circumstances change or if the individual demonstrates that the grounds for disqualification no longer apply.
For individuals affected by the disqualification decision, the SISA offers a process for reconsideration. Section 344 of the SISA allows a person to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should outline the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that individuals have an opportunity to challenge the decision and seek a remedy if they believe it to be unjust or based on erroneous grounds.